Skip to main content

Security report for jrmyprtr.com

Jeremy Porter · Media · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jeremy Porter is a New York-based communications consultant specializing in advertising, branding, persuasion, public relations, public speaking, and writing. The website positions Jeremy Porter as a trusted expert with a focus on strategic messaging and narrative development, supported by client testimonials and a professional online presence. The business operates primarily as a consulting service with content publishing to engage its audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Genesis Framework and Parallax Pro theme, with modern SEO practices via Yoast SEO and integration of MailChimp for newsletter subscriptions. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, but lacks security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit contact emails or phone numbers are provided, only a contact form. Overall, the domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, indicating legitimacy. The website content is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable material detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jrmyprtr.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jeremy Porter operates in the media sector as a small-sized communications consultancy with a history dating back to 2006. The business targets professionals and organizations seeking expert communications advice and services. Its competitive advantage lies in strategic narrative and messaging expertise, supported by positive client testimonials. The business model combines consulting services with content marketing through blog articles and guides. External links include some unrelated or suspicious domains embedded in hidden content, which may indicate SEO manipulation attempts. The company maintains a modest digital footprint with limited direct contact information but leverages social media presence on Twitter. Growth indicators include regular blog updates and newsletter engagement. No formal partnerships or subsidiaries were identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, which are positive security indicators. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, reducing DNS security. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, and no security contact emails are provided. The site uses standard WordPress plugins and themes, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is insufficient, with no privacy or cookie policies detected, potentially exposing the business to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with basic best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  4. Provide explicit company contact emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jeremy Porter
Description
Helping people think about communications. Topics include: advertising, branding, persuasion, public relations, public speaking, and writing.
Key services
Communications consulting, Strategy, Narrative development, Messaging, Public speaking, Writing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Yoast SEO plugin, MailChimp, Genesis Framework, Parallax Pro Theme
Frameworks
Genesis Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed emails or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MailChimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional communications consulting site with clear business focus
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers visible, only contact form
  5. External links include some suspicious unrelated domains in hidden links section, possibly SEO spam
  6. Uses WordPress with Yoast SEO and Genesis Framework, indicating modern CMS usage
  7. No security headers detected, DNSSEC not enabled
  8. MailChimp used for newsletter subscription
  9. No social media links explicitly found except Twitter handle in meta tags
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audience
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Genesis Framework and Parallax Pro theme, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization. It uses jQuery and standard WordPress scripts for functionality. The site integrates MailChimp for newsletter subscriptions, indicating use of third-party marketing tools. Hosting appears to be managed via NameCheap with DNS services provided by DDoS-Guard. Performance is moderate with no major errors detected, and the site is mobile optimized. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The presence of hidden links to unrelated external domains suggests possible SEO spam or manipulation attempts, which should be reviewed and cleaned to avoid SEO penalties. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jrmyprtr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jrmyprtr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.