Skip to main content

Security report for jpmorgan.com

J.P. Morgan · Finance · Finland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

J.P. Morgan is a leading global financial services firm with a strong presence in Finland, offering a broad range of services including investment banking, asset management, wealth management, and treasury services. The company targets corporate clients, financial institutions, and high net worth individuals, maintaining a market-leading position supported by a robust business model and extensive global network. The website reflects the enterprise scale and professionalism expected from a top-tier financial institution. Technically, the website leverages modern technologies such as Adobe Experience Manager for content management, Brightcove for video delivery, and OneTrust for cookie consent management, hosted on a reliable Akamai CDN infrastructure. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements comprehensive security headers, and maintains clear policies on privacy, incident response, and vulnerability disclosure. The absence of exposed vulnerabilities and the presence of certifications like ISO 27001 and SOC 2 reflect a strong security posture. The domain WHOIS data is not publicly available, which is typical for high-profile financial institutions to protect against targeted attacks. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong trust indicators, compliance with GDPR, and transparent security practices. Strategic recommendations include continuous monitoring of third-party scripts, enhancing incident response visibility, and maintaining rigorous security audits to sustain the high security and compliance standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jpmorgan.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jpmorgan.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate jpmorgan.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
60
Registered
60
Resolving
60
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-21

Masked preview

  • jp•••••••.comMediumaddition
  • jp••••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • jp••••••.comMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of jpmorgan.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

J.P. Morgan operates as a global financial powerhouse with a diversified portfolio of services catering to institutional and individual clients. Its competitive advantages include a long-standing market presence since 1799, a strong brand, and a comprehensive service offering. Revenue streams are diversified across investment banking fees, asset management commissions, and treasury services. The company targets sophisticated financial clients and leverages partnerships and subsidiaries such as Chase Bank to cover retail banking. Growth indicators include digital transformation initiatives and global expansion. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers like Adobe and Akamai, enhancing digital delivery and security.

Security posture

The security maturity of J.P. Morgan's website is high, with enforced HTTPS, robust security headers, and adherence to industry standards such as ISO 27001 and PCI DSS. The presence of a dedicated incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure program indicates preparedness for security events. Compliance with GDPR is evident through comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security culture is supported by transparent communication and certifications. Areas for improvement include regular third-party script audits and enhanced public reporting on security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement continuous monitoring and regular audits of third-party scripts to prevent supply chain vulnerabilities.
  2. Enhance public visibility of incident response processes and reporting to build greater trust.
  3. Ensure all web forms include anti-CSRF tokens and other input validation mechanisms.
  4. Maintain and update security headers and SSL/TLS configurations regularly to adhere to best practices.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy focusing on zero-trust principles and advanced threat detection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
J.P. Morgan
Description
J.P. Morgan is a global financial services firm providing investment banking, asset management, wealth management, and treasury services.
Key services
Investment Banking, Asset Management, Wealth Management, Treasury Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Target, Brightcove Video Player, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Akamai CDN, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure forms with consent mechanisms
  • Use of reputable third-party security and consent tools

Analytics and tracking

Services
Akamai mPulse
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Target, Akamai mPulse
Marketing tools
Adobe Target, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and professional.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms in place.
  4. Comprehensive security and incident response information available.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and content delivery networks.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is modern and robust, utilizing Adobe Experience Manager as the CMS, which supports scalable content delivery and personalization. The use of Brightcove for video content and OneTrust for cookie management reflects integration with industry-leading platforms. Hosting on Akamai CDN ensures fast global content delivery and resilience. Performance metrics indicate fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are implemented to support diverse user needs. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for ongoing management of third-party dependencies and ensuring compliance with evolving web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100 +2Low20 findingsView report
  2. 81/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jpmorgan.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jpmorgan.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.