Skip to main content

Security report for jouwggd.nl

Jouw GGD · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jouw GGD.nl is a Dutch public health information website focused on youth health topics, providing accessible information, anonymous chat services with youth healthcare professionals, and regional GGD contact details. The website is well-positioned as a trusted regional health resource with a clear mission to support young people in the Netherlands. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript enhancements, uses Matomo and Google Tag Manager for analytics, and integrates accessibility tools like ReadSpeaker. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, clear navigation, and consistent branding. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, DNSSEC, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure practices are absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in formal security documentation and direct contact information. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the website's credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jouwggd.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jouwggd.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jouwggd.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as an informational platform under the umbrella of Dutch regional public health services (GGD). Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on public health education and support for youth. The target audience is young people in the Netherlands seeking health advice and support. The site leverages partnerships with regional health organizations and chat service providers to extend its offerings. Its competitive advantage lies in trusted, regionally relevant health content and direct access to healthcare professionals via chat. The presence of social media channels and interactive tools indicates engagement strategies to maintain relevance and reach. The website's longevity since 2011 and consistent domain registration reflect stability and institutional backing.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, enhancing user privacy protections. The use of Matomo analytics suggests a preference for privacy-conscious tracking. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in formal security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers beyond HTTPS are not explicitly identified, suggesting potential improvements. Overall, the site balances usability and security well but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user protections.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Consider providing direct contact information (email/phone) for general and security inquiries to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jouw GGD
Description
Alles over gezondheid voor jongeren.
Key services
health information, anonymous chat with youth nurses/doctors, self-tests and modules, regional GGD contact information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, ReadSpeaker
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure chat links

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Dutch public health information portal targeting youth.
  2. Content is well-structured with clear navigation and topical categorization.
  3. Multiple social media channels are linked and active.
  4. Chat service with healthcare professionals is prominently featured.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via forms and chat.
  6. No explicit terms of service page detected.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. Use of modern analytics tools with privacy considerations.
  10. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme 'jouwggd-2021' and uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading for analytics and accessibility tools. It integrates Matomo for privacy-focused analytics and Google Tag Manager for marketing tags. The site uses ReadSpeaker for accessibility, enhancing inclusivity. Performance is moderate with optimized images and CSS caching via Autoptimize. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are well implemented. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the domain uses DNSSEC and a reputable registrar. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jouwggd.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jouwggd.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.