Skip to main content

Security report for joomlart.com

JoomlArt · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JoomlArt is a well-established provider of Joomla templates, extensions, and related services, operating since 2005 and serving over 300,000 loyal customers. The company offers a comprehensive suite of products including Joomla templates, the T4 Page Builder, and T4 Framework, targeting Joomla developers, businesses, and agencies. Their market position is strong within the Joomla ecosystem, supported by multiple Joomla clubs and a vibrant community. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as Joomla CMS, Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies. However, WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and business credible, with minor areas for security enhancement.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of joomlart.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching joomlart.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JoomlArt operates a subscription and product sales business model focused on Joomla templates and extensions. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive product portfolio, continuous updates, and strong community engagement. The company targets Joomla users globally, including developers and agencies, and maintains partnerships with other Joomla clubs. Revenue streams likely include template and extension sales, subscription bundles, and web development services. Growth indicators include active product updates, a large member base, and multiple Joomla clubs under their umbrella. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized Joomla extension providers, enhancing their market reach and credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling including CSRF tokens. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, which could limit transparency and responsiveness to security issues. The lack of WHOIS data transparency is a concern for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and published security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Enhance visibility of contact information for security and abuse reporting to facilitate communication.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability issues to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JoomlArt
Description
JoomlArt offers responsive Joomla templates and free Joomla templates with a collection of 200+ Joomla templates and 40+ Joomla extensions, serving over 300,000 members since 2005.
Key services
Joomla Templates, Joomla Extensions, T4 Page Builder, T4 Framework, Web Development Services, Joomla 5 Migration Service
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Bootstrap CSS, Font Awesome, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Disqus, Crisp Chat, Cookie Consent, T4 Framework, T4 Page Builder
Frameworks
T3 Framework, T4 Framework
Platforms
Joomla CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Nudgify Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Nudgify
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages present
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  5. Multiple trusted Joomla-related partner domains linked
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  7. Active community and support infrastructure
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap and Font Awesome. It uses advanced Joomla frameworks like T3 and T4 Framework and integrates a drag-and-drop page builder (T4 Page Builder). The site loads moderate performance scripts including analytics and chat services. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well implemented. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low with active updates and modern libraries. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and streamline third-party script usage to enhance performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with joomlart.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review joomlart.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.