Skip to main content

Security report for joomlart.com

JoomlArt · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JoomlArt is a well-established provider of Joomla templates, extensions, and related services with over 19 years of experience and a large customer base exceeding 300,000 members. The company operates multiple top Joomla clubs, offering a comprehensive suite of products including the T4 Page Builder and T4 Framework, targeting Joomla developers and businesses seeking professional website solutions. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with modern frameworks and libraries, optimized for mobile and SEO, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure payment indicators, though explicit security policies and incident response details are lacking. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data is a concern but the website's content quality, branding, and community presence support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the Joomla ecosystem.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching joomlart.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JoomlArt holds a strong market position as a leading Joomla template and extension club operator, leveraging multiple subsidiary brands to cover a broad spectrum of Joomla-related products. Their business model centers on subscription and product sales, supported by web development and migration services. The company targets Joomla developers, agencies, and businesses requiring responsive and customizable Joomla solutions. Their ecosystem includes partnerships with Gavick, Shape5, JomSocial, and iJoomla, enhancing their product portfolio and market reach. Growth indicators include continuous product updates, active community forums, and a large loyal customer base. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining domain registration transparency and enhancing security communication to bolster trust further.

Security posture

JoomlArt demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, secure payment methods, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools is balanced with privacy compliance measures such as cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure channels indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or security issues were detected in the site content. Strengthening security headers and publishing a security.txt file would enhance their security maturity and customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website footer.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  5. Maintain regular audits of third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JoomlArt
Description
JoomlArt offers responsive Joomla templates and free Joomla templates with a collection of 200+ templates and 40+ extensions, serving over 300,000 members since 2005.
Key services
Joomla Templates, Joomla Extensions, T4 Page Builder, T4 Framework, Web Development Services, Joomla Migration Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Bootstrap CSS, Font Awesome, jQuery, MooTools, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Disqus, CookieConsent, Crisp Chat, Nudgify Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
T3 Framework, T4 Framework
Platforms
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure payment icons displayed
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Nudgify
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Nudgify
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong branding with multiple Joomla-related clubs and extensions.
  3. Comprehensive product and service offerings related to Joomla CMS.
  4. Active community and support infrastructure present.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust score but website presence is strong.
  7. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Joomla CMS with the T3 and T4 frameworks, integrating Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery, and MooTools for frontend functionality. It uses Google Fonts and multiple Google and Facebook analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and CDN usage for static assets. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and streamline third-party script usage to reduce potential attack surfaces.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with joomlart.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review joomlart.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.