Skip to main content

Security report for jonika.lv

JONIKA · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JONIKA is a Latvian architecture and design company established in 1992, offering a broad range of services including architectural design, interior design, custom furniture manufacturing, exclusive design object sales, and modular home construction. The company emphasizes sustainability, functionality, and aesthetic quality, serving both private and public clients. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with detailed information about their team, history, and services. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, uses modern JavaScript libraries, and is hosted via Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and standard secure login forms but lacks visible security headers and a comprehensive privacy policy, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jonika.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JONIKA holds a strong position in the Latvian architecture and design market with over 30 years of experience. Their business model combines service offerings with product sales through an online store, targeting individuals and organizations seeking high-quality architectural and interior design solutions. The company leverages its brand heritage and professional team to maintain competitive advantages. Their partnership ecosystem includes social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. Growth indicators include a diversified service portfolio and a focus on sustainability, which aligns with current market trends. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance digital trust through improved privacy and security disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is limited due to the lack of a visible privacy policy and detailed cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve web security.
  3. Provide clear incident response and security contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to explicitly inform users and obtain consent.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JONIKA
Description
JONIKA is an architecture and design company with over 32 years of experience, offering architectural design, interior design, custom furniture, exclusive design objects, and modular homes. They emphasize sustainability, functionality, and aesthetics, serving private and public clients.
Key services
Architectural design, Interior design, Custom furniture manufacturing, Exclusive design object sales, Modular home design and construction supervision
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure login form with password fields
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the company and services.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  4. Secure HTTPS connection and use of modern analytics and marketing tools.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  6. Contact information including phone and email is clearly presented in footer.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  8. Website uses Mozello CMS and Amazon CloudFront CDN.
  9. Login form present with standard fields and client-side validation.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but somewhat dated JavaScript library (jQuery 2.2.4) alongside Fancybox and Bannerplay for UI components. Hosting via Amazon CloudFront CDN supports good content delivery performance. The Mozello CMS platform provides a structured content management environment but may limit advanced customization. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. SEO optimization is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport settings but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by updating libraries and optimizing assets.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jonika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jonika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.