Skip to main content

Security report for joinfurther.com

Further · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Further operates as a provider of modern EIS fund administration software, targeting venture capital funds and investors interested in startups. The company positions itself as a market leader in fund operations software, offering SaaS solutions to streamline fund management. The website content is professional but basic, focusing on describing the business and its services without extensive detail or visible trust signals such as certifications or client testimonials. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including React, Bootstrap, and jQuery, with resources loaded from reputable CDNs. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the provided data. From a security perspective, the website lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. HTTPS status and SSL configuration could not be confirmed from the data, and no contact information for incident response or data protection officers is present. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, reducing trustworthiness and raising questions about domain legitimacy. Cookie consent is implemented via CookieYes, indicating some level of privacy compliance. Overall, the website presents a functional but minimal online presence with moderate technical maturity and limited security posture. Strategic improvements in transparency, security policies, and contact information would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching joinfurther.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
90
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Further targets the niche market of venture capital fund administration software, leveraging a SaaS business model. Its competitive advantage lies in providing modern, streamlined fund operations tools for EIS funds. The company appears to be small-sized with a focused sector presence in finance and technology. The lack of detailed business information, such as founding year or parent company, limits deeper analysis. The presence of a Twitter account suggests some engagement with the startup and investment community. The absence of WHOIS data and contact details may impact credibility and customer trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with no detected advanced security headers or policies. The website uses HTTPS (implied by external CDN usage and modern standards) but this cannot be fully confirmed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided HTML. The lack of privacy and security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration inconsistencies pose a risk factor. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, requiring enhancements to meet industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies on the website.
  2. Add clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  3. Verify and ensure HTTPS is properly configured with strong SSL/TLS settings.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Further
Description
Market-leading fund operations software, powering top venture capital funds as they invest in the startups of tomorrow.
Key services
EIS fund administration software, Fund operations management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
cookieyes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a .com domain with active content.
  3. No visible privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the homepage HTML.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active via CookieYes.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  7. Use of modern frontend technologies like React and Bootstrap.
  8. External resources loaded from trusted CDNs.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML metadata.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly identified except cookie consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React with Bootstrap for styling and jQuery for legacy support. External libraries are loaded from trusted CDNs, which supports performance and reliability. The site uses modern JavaScript module loading and CSS preloading techniques. However, the site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and navigation clarity. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The absence of security headers and incomplete metadata reduces the technical robustness. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but basic, suitable for a small SaaS business but requiring enhancements for scalability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with joinfurther.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review joinfurther.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.