John+Bamberg · Healthcare · Germany
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.
John+Bamberg is a German healthcare provider specializing in orthopaedic technology, prosthetics, rehabilitation aids, and related services. The company operates as part of the Ottobock.care network, a large international consortium of patient care providers, enhancing its market position and service capabilities. The website clearly targets patients requiring orthopaedic and rehabilitation solutions, offering a broad range of products and services including children's orthopaedics, prosthetics, orthopaedic shoes, and neurorehabilitation. Founded in 1974, the company has a medium-sized footprint in the healthcare sector in Germany. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS, uses modern web technologies such as jQuery and cookieconsent2 for privacy compliance, and is hosted by Pironet NDH. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and a professional design with clear navigation. Cookie consent is implemented, and privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. However, no structured data (JSON-LD) or advanced accessibility features were detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with an excellent SSL configuration and includes a cookie consent mechanism. However, no explicit security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published. Security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is room for improvement in formalizing security practices and enhancing accessibility. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with privacy regulations, with a strong business credibility supported by its affiliation with Ottobock. Recommendations include publishing a security policy, adding incident response information, implementing security headers, and improving accessibility to further strengthen the security posture and user trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention john-bamberg.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for john-bamberg.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with john-bamberg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review john-bamberg.de.