Skip to main content

Security report for jogurtdanone.pl

DANONE · Retail · Poland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DANONE is a globally recognized enterprise specializing in dairy, plant-based products, water, beverages, and specialized nutrition. The website focuses on promoting Danone's yogurt products in Poland, emphasizing natural ingredients and live bacterial cultures. The company maintains a strong market position with multiple subsidiary brands and a comprehensive product portfolio. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, featuring professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though explicit cookie consent and security policies are lacking. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and incident response transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jogurtdanone.pl. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jogurtdanone.pl

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jogurtdanone.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jogurtdanone.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DANONE operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors, targeting general consumers interested in health and nutrition. The business model centers on manufacturing and distributing dairy and plant-based food products, supported by specialized nutrition lines. The company leverages a broad partnership ecosystem with multiple brand-specific domains and maintains active social media channels for engagement. Growth indicators include recent investments in production facilities and digital transformation initiatives. The website content and structure support brand consistency and trust, positioning DANONE as a leading player in the Polish market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers like HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. The site uses secure forms and modern libraries without known vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR is implied through the privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a clear and user-friendly cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide direct contact channels for security incidents, such as security@danone.pl or abuse@danone.pl.
  5. Continue enhancing accessibility features and monitor third-party libraries for vulnerabilities to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DANONE
Description
DANONE is a group of companies specializing in dairy and plant-based products, water and beverages, and specialized nutrition. The website focuses on Danone yogurts, emphasizing natural ingredients and live bacterial cultures.
Key services
Production and sale of dairy and plant-based yogurts, Specialized nutrition products, Water and beverage products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Popper.js 1.14.7, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens (inferred)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on Danone's yogurt products.
  3. Strong branding and consistent messaging throughout the site.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Social media presence is integrated for career and brand engagement.
  6. Lacks explicit cookie consent mechanism despite EU GDPR requirements.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  8. Contact information is primarily via contact form and social media links.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  10. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including jQuery, Popper.js, Bootstrap, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature front-end infrastructure. The use of SilverStripe CMS is inferred from form naming conventions and URL structures. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts, and mobile optimization is good. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features such as font size adjustment and high contrast mode are present, reflecting attention to diverse user needs. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of explicit cookie consent and security policy pages suggests areas for modernization and compliance improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jogurtdanone.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jogurtdanone.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.