Skip to main content

Security report for jnjinstitute.com

Johnson & Johnson Institute · Healthcare · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Johnson & Johnson Institute website serves as a professional platform providing medical education and training resources globally. It targets healthcare professionals seeking both physical and virtual learning opportunities. The site is built on Drupal 10 and integrates modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The website demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, supporting a positive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, though improvements like DNSSEC and enhanced security headers could be implemented. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies including consent mechanisms. Overall, the site reflects a reputable enterprise-level healthcare education provider with consistent branding and trustworthy domain registration.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jnjinstitute.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jnjinstitute.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jnjinstitute.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
255
Employees
0
Customers
255
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jnjinstitute.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate jnjinstitute.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
6
Registered
6
Resolving
6
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • jj•••••••••.comMediumomission
  • nj•••••••••.comMediumomission
  • jn•••••••••.comLowomission

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of jnjinstitute.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Johnson & Johnson Institute operates as a key player in the healthcare education sector, leveraging its parent company's brand strength. The business model focuses on delivering professional medical training through both physical centers and virtual platforms, catering to a global audience of healthcare practitioners. The website content and structure support this positioning, emphasizing educational resources and training programs. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly through user accounts or partner networks. The use of advanced analytics and tracking indicates a focus on user engagement and continuous improvement. The domain age and registration details align with the company's established market presence since 2015.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, reducing risks of unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS queries to spoofing attacks. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. The use of reputable analytics and tracking services is balanced with privacy compliance measures. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all audiences.
  5. Consider adding clear and verified contact information for support and security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Johnson & Johnson Institute
Description
Providing both physical and virtual learning centers worldwide for professional medical education and training.
Key services
Professional medical education, Training centers (physical and virtual), Medical resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and include consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is well maintained and not privacy protected.
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Drupal 10 CMS, indicating a modern and scalable content management system. It uses popular front-end libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and Font Awesome for icons. Analytics and user behavior tracking are implemented via Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager, supporting data-driven decision making. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently, though performance is moderate, suggesting potential optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. Hosting and DNS are managed through Key-Systems GmbH and NS1/jnjdns.com respectively, with no signs of suspicious infrastructure. Overall, the technical stack is robust but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jnjinstitute.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jnjinstitute.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.