Skip to main content

Security report for jnails.info

J Nails · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

J Nails is a small, local beauty service provider specializing in professional nail care services including hygienic manicure, gel polish application, and nail design, primarily serving clients in Riga, Latvia. The website is well-structured and provides clear information about services, contact details, and social media presence, positioning the business as a trustworthy local salon. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks such as Astro and hosted on Hostinger with Zyro ecommerce integration, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and uses Google Fonts for consistent branding. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers were detected, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust. Privacy compliance is partial with a cookie consent banner present but no privacy policy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the business appears legitimate and professional but could improve compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jnails.info

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jnails.info, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jnails.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

J Nails operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on nail care services for a local clientele in Riga. The business model is service-oriented with direct client engagement through online booking and contact forms. The company leverages social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok for marketing and customer engagement. The absence of detailed WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, common for small businesses. The website content and design indicate a consistent brand identity and a focus on quality and client satisfaction. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS as indicated by canonical URLs but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended for enhanced security. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms are present but no explicit anti-CSRF or input validation mechanisms are visible. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact reduces preparedness for security incidents. WHOIS privacy protection is used, which is justified for this business type but limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Add explicit SSL/TLS configuration details and ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and provide clear contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
J Nails
Description
Piedāvājam profesionālas nagu kopšanas pakalpojumus Rīgā - manikīrs un nagu dizains. Vēlamies katram klientam sniegt izcilu un individuāli pielāgotu pieredzi.
Key services
Hygienic manicure, Classic manicure with gel polish, Gel nail correction, Nail design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hostinger Website Builder, Google Fonts (Poppins), Astro framework, Zyro ecommerce platform
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Zyro ecommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by canonical URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed small business site for a nail salon in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear service descriptions and contact info.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and active, indicating some privacy compliance.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or query failure.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  7. Social media links to Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok are provided and active.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML content.
  9. No signs of adult or explicit content; content safety rating is safe.
  10. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Astro framework and hosted on Hostinger with Zyro ecommerce integration, indicating a modern and modular technical infrastructure. Google Fonts are used for typography consistency. The site includes video backgrounds and responsive images optimized for different devices, contributing to good mobile optimization and user experience. Performance is moderate, with no heavy analytics or tracking scripts detected, which benefits privacy and speed. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jnails.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jnails.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.