Skip to main content

Security report for jlindeberg.com

J.Lindeberg · Retail · Sweden

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

J.Lindeberg is a premium fashion brand specializing in men’s and women’s activewear and sports-inspired apparel, including golf, ski, and tennis collections. The company operates a direct-to-consumer e-commerce platform hosted on Shopify, complemented by physical retail locations. Their website features a membership program offering exclusive benefits, positioning them as a lifestyle brand blending fashion and sport. The technical infrastructure leverages modern e-commerce technologies and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Trustpilot, Klaviyo, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosures are absent. The domain WHOIS data is missing or unregistered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional website presence. Overall, the site is well-designed, performant, and compliant with privacy regulations, but domain registration inconsistencies warrant further verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jlindeberg.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

J.Lindeberg holds a strong market position in the premium fashion and sportswear sector, targeting fashion-conscious consumers seeking high-quality activewear. Their business model focuses on e-commerce sales supported by physical stores and a membership club to foster customer loyalty. The integration of advanced marketing tools and analytics suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and retention. The absence of clear domain registration data is unusual for a brand of this stature and should be investigated. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and offers comprehensive customer support via multiple store-specific emails. No direct phone contacts or corporate registration details were found on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and secure form handling including CAPTCHA protections. Privacy compliance is evident through detailed privacy and cookie policies and GDPR consent mechanisms. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may impact trust among security-conscious users. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Recommendations include publishing explicit security documentation and establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel to enhance security posture and customer confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information page.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance Content Security Policy headers to cover all third-party scripts comprehensively.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party marketing and analytics scripts to mitigate risks.
  5. Provide clear security contact channels for reporting issues and inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
J.Lindeberg
Description
J.Lindeberg offers men’s and women’s fashion including activewear, golf, ski, and tennis collections blending fashion and sport. They provide a membership club with exclusive benefits.
Key services
Online retail of apparel and accessories, Membership club with exclusive offers, Multi-location physical stores
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shopify, JavaScript ES Modules, Shopify Payments, Trustpilot, Nosto, Klaviyo, Microsoft Clarity, Fibbl, Gorgias Chat
Frameworks
Shopify Liquid, Shopify Storefront API
Platforms
Shopify e-commerce platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CAPTCHA integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Shopify Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo, Fibbl
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Trustpilot, Klaviyo, Nosto, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Triggerbee, Klaviyo, Nosto, Fibbl
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed e-commerce site for a premium fashion brand.
  2. Uses Shopify platform with multiple third-party marketing and analytics integrations.
  3. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  4. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration anomaly.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Contact information includes emails for store locations but no direct phone numbers found.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Shopify platform, utilizing modern JavaScript modules and a robust tech stack including Trustpilot, Klaviyo, Nosto, and Microsoft Clarity for marketing and analytics. Hosting is via Shopify’s CDN ensuring fast load times and global availability. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO best practices implemented. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces some complexity and potential risk vectors, which should be managed through regular security reviews. Overall, the technical implementation is modern, performant, and aligned with e-commerce industry standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jlindeberg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jlindeberg.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.