Skip to main content

Security report for jinkosolar.com

Jinko Solar · Energy · China

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jinko Solar is a leading global solar energy company specializing in the manufacture and distribution of high-efficiency photovoltaic modules, exemplified by their Tiger Neo 3.0 product line featuring advanced TOPCon cell technology. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information, sustainability initiatives, and global reach. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, ensuring a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements in security headers and explicit security policies are recommended. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the renewable energy market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jinkosolar.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
85
Email security
98
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jinko Solar operates in the energy sector with a focus on solar photovoltaic technology. The company has shipped over 320GW of modules globally, indicating a large enterprise scale and strong market position. Their business model centers on manufacturing and global distribution, targeting solar project developers, investors, and customers worldwide. The website reflects a consistent branding strategy and highlights sustainability and ESG efforts, which align with current market trends. Partnerships and investor relations are supported via dedicated subdomains, enhancing corporate transparency and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, demonstrating awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels is transparent but should be regularly audited for security. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional best practices and explicit policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jinko Solar
Description
Jinko Solar is a global energy company specializing in solar photovoltaic modules and technology, offering high-efficiency solar products such as the Tiger Neo 3.0 series with advanced TOPCon cells.
Key services
Solar module manufacturing, Product documentation and support, Global distribution and delivery, Sustainability and ESG initiatives
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Swiper.js, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), Baidu Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Baidu Analytics, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No WHOIS data available from raw output, indicating possible privacy or registry data unavailability
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent banner present with user interaction
  4. No explicit terms of service page found
  5. Multiple social media links to official company profiles
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools
  8. Strong branding and consistent design
  9. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Swiper.js for UI components, and GSAP for animations, providing a rich interactive experience. Tracking and analytics are implemented via Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Baidu Analytics, supporting marketing and user behavior insights. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and accessibility compliance. The technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jinkosolar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jinkosolar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.