Skip to main content

Security report for jinja.com.au

Oran Park Hotel · Hospitality · Australia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oran Park Hotel operates the Jinja Rooftop, a hospitality venue in Australia offering a rooftop bar and restaurant experience with live entertainment and event hosting services. The website is professionally designed on the Squarespace platform, featuring clear branding and navigation tailored for adult audiences. The technical infrastructure is modern and secure, with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Contact information is limited to an events email, with no phone or physical address clearly provided. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities, but the absence of incident response and security policies is noted. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in privacy compliance and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jinja.com.au

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets adult customers seeking social and event experiences in hospitality, leveraging partnerships with loyalty programs, gift voucher providers, career platforms, and booking services. The business model focuses on food, drinks, and event hosting, positioning itself as a local venue with a medium-sized operation. The website content and external links indicate a well-integrated ecosystem supporting customer engagement and operational efficiency. Growth potential is supported by event hosting and private dining offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates good security hygiene with HTTPS and HSTS, no exposed sensitive data, and no detected vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for comprehensive security maturity. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. The site does not appear to use extensive tracking or analytics, reducing privacy risks but also limiting data-driven insights.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to obtain user consent for tracking and cookies.
  3. Add clear contact information including phone number and physical address to enhance business credibility.
  4. Develop and publish security and incident response policies with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oran Park Hotel
Description
Jinja Rooftop is a rooftop bar and restaurant offering magical sunsets, delicious drinks, vibrant energy, rooftop views, live entertainment, and a menu designed to delight taste buds. It is exclusively for guests aged 18 and over. The venue also hosts functions and private dining events.
Key services
Rooftop bar and restaurant, Live entertainment, Event hosting for birthdays, celebrations, corporate gatherings, Private dining room bookings, Banquet menu
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, jQuery, Typekit Fonts, Google Fonts
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using Squarespace platform
  2. Content is focused on hospitality services with clear branding
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  4. Contact email for events is provided
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the content
  6. Social media presence includes Instagram link
  7. No visible security or incident response policies
  8. No forms detected on the analyzed page
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected beyond platform defaults
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Squarespace CMS, utilizing modern web fonts (Typekit, Google Fonts) and jQuery. It is hosted on Squarespace's CDN infrastructure, ensuring good availability and performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses standard SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. No heavy analytics or third-party tracking scripts were detected, indicating a lightweight footprint. The site could benefit from improved accessibility and more explicit privacy and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jinja.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jinja.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.