Skip to main content

Security report for jesus.shoes

mschf · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jesus.shoes is a niche retail e-commerce platform focused on selling a limited edition sneaker product called 'Jesus Shoes' by the brand MSCHF. The site markets the product as air bubble shoes filled with holy water, targeting sneaker enthusiasts and collectors interested in unique and artistic footwear. The business model revolves around limited product drops and building a subscriber base via phone number text lists for future releases. The site content is professionally designed with consistent branding and good user experience, optimized for mobile devices and leveraging modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Bulma CSS framework. Analytics tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for marketing and user tracking purposes. However, the site lacks publicly available privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as explicit contact information, which impacts privacy compliance and business credibility scores. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for this type of small retail artistic project, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site is functional and visually appealing but would benefit from improved compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jesus.shoes

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MSCHF positions itself in the niche market of novelty and limited edition sneaker drops, leveraging hype culture and artistic themes to attract a dedicated audience. The business model is based on scarcity and exclusivity, with direct-to-consumer sales via their website and text list subscriptions to maintain customer engagement. The lack of detailed business information and contact details suggests a small or boutique operation focused on brand mystique. The use of modern web technologies and analytics indicates a digitally mature approach to marketing and customer data collection. The absence of privacy and security policies may expose the business to compliance risks, especially in regulated markets. Strategic partnerships or payment processors are not explicitly identified in the data. Growth potential lies in expanding product lines and improving transparency to build trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits the ability to responsibly report security issues. The site does not provide contact channels for incident response or security concerns. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could lead to regulatory non-compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information and a security policy page to improve business credibility and incident response readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
mschf
Description
Walk on water with these air bubble shoes filled with holy water.
Key services
Limited edition sneaker sales, Text list subscription for future drops
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Bulma CSS, Google Analytics, Modernizr, Detectizr, Nuxt.js
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a product drop page for a novelty sneaker called 'Jesus Shoes' by MSCHF.
  2. No public WHOIS registrant data available; privacy protection in place.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found on the site.
  4. No explicit contact information or business address found.
  5. Site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No signs of adult or explicit content; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  9. Marketing relies on text list subscription and social media integration.
  10. Limited business information and no certifications or security policies disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, specifically Nuxt.js, combined with Bulma CSS for styling. It uses analytics tools including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and preloads critical scripts for performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. Accessibility is basic, lacking advanced features. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but no structured data like JSON-LD detected. The site does not expose any sensitive data or use outdated libraries, indicating good technical hygiene. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and compliance documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jesus.shoes. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jesus.shoes.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.