Skip to main content

Security report for jerking.site

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf · Media · Iceland

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jerking Site is an adult content directory launched recently in 2024, offering curated lists of pornographic websites across multiple categories including tube sites, sex cams, dating, premium porn, games, and niche segments such as Indian and AI porn. The site operates primarily as an affiliate marketing platform, directing traffic to partner adult sites and monetizing through affiliate programs. Technically, the site uses a standard web stack with jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics, hosted on Sered DNS servers. The design is functional and mobile responsive but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no DNSSEC or security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies published, indicating compliance gaps. The domain is very new and uses privacy protection, which is common in the adult industry but reduces trust slightly. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF blocking and provides a moderate user experience with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jerking.site

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on affiliate marketing within the adult entertainment sector, targeting adult users seeking safe and quality pornographic content. The site aggregates and categorizes popular and niche adult sites, leveraging partnerships with affiliate networks and traffic redirect domains. Market positioning is niche but competitive, focusing on quality and safe browsing claims. Revenue streams likely derive from affiliate commissions and traffic monetization. The site lacks visible trust indicators such as certifications or user testimonials. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS and absence of detailed business info is typical for adult sites but impacts credibility. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple affiliate link providers and adult networks, indicating a well-integrated affiliate marketing approach.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. HTTPS is implemented, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are present, exposing the site to potential risks such as clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of cookie consent mechanisms indicate non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. External scripts and affiliate links increase the attack surface. The site should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to inform users and obtain consent for tracking cookies.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear security and abuse contact information to improve incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
Jerking Site is a directory listing and reviewing adult porn websites, providing categorized links to free and premium porn sites, sex cam sites, dating sex sites, porn games, and niche categories such as teen, mature, gay, AI porn, and Indian porn chat models.
Key services
Porn site directory, Affiliate referrals, Adult content categorization, Traffic monetization via affiliate programs
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, jRating, Custom JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://jerking.site/)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
BrazzersNetwork, RealityKings, NaughtyAmerica, Teamskeet, MofosNetwork, BabesNetwork, GaywireNetwork
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a curated adult content directory with affiliate marketing links.
  2. No privacy policy or cookie consent mechanisms found, which is a compliance risk.
  3. Uses multiple external affiliate and partner domains for monetization.
  4. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations.
  5. Domain is very new and uses privacy protection for WHOIS.
  6. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  7. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  8. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses found; only one contact email.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage or main content for user data collection.
  10. Website design is functional and mobile responsive but lacks advanced accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a conventional technology stack with jQuery and Bootstrap for UI, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and Font Awesome for icons. Hosting appears to be via Sered DNS servers. The site is mobile responsive with a grid layout for content. Performance is moderate with multiple external resources loaded. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. No CMS is identified, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security headers and privacy compliance features. Modernization opportunities include adopting more robust privacy and security standards and improving SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jerking.site. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jerking.site.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.