Skip to main content

Security report for jenprocasopisy.cz

MAFRA, a.s. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JenProČasopisy.cz is a Czech media subscription platform operated by MAFRA, a.s., offering printed magazine subscriptions targeted at women, men, children, and lifestyle audiences. The website provides a broad catalog of magazine titles, digital edition access, and customer support including SMS ordering. The business model centers on subscription sales with a clear market position in the Czech media sector. Technically, the site employs modern analytics and advertising technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Gemius, and Maileon Analytics, alongside a consent management platform to comply with GDPR requirements. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and well-structured with good navigation and content relevance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms in place, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which impacts domain trust assessment negatively. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy from a business and user perspective but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jenprocasopisy.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jenprocasopisy.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
263
Employees
0
Customers
263
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jenprocasopisy.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform serves a medium-sized media sector business under MAFRA, a.s., focusing on magazine subscriptions in the Czech Republic. It targets a general audience interested in lifestyle, TV programs, hobbies, and celebrity news. The business leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and advertising revenue. The presence of a Facebook page and clear contact channels supports customer interaction. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not contradict the business legitimacy given the known parent company. The company benefits from brand consistency and trust signals such as HTTPS and published terms. Growth potential lies in expanding digital offerings and enhancing security and privacy transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a consent management platform, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance. However, no security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published. The login form includes client-side validation but no visible advanced security controls. The use of multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks if not regularly audited. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve user experience for all users.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MAFRA, a.s.
Description
Předplatné tištěných titulů pro ženy, muže a děti. Časopisy o vaření, celebritách, televizní programy a další tituly.
Key services
Magazine subscriptions, Digital edition access, Customer support, SMS ordering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Gemius Analytics, Maileon Analytics, CPEX Consent Management Platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for GDPR
  • Secure login form with client-side validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Gemius, Maileon Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Gemius, Maileon Analytics
Marketing tools
CPEX CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on magazine subscriptions with clear categorization and navigation.
  3. Multiple analytics and advertising scripts are used with consent management.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond basic terms and cookie info.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  6. Contact information is present but no direct company emails found in HTML.
  7. Site uses legacy charset windows-1250 but modern scripts and responsive design.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mix of legacy and modern technologies, including windows-1250 charset and modern JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. It integrates multiple analytics platforms (Google Analytics, Gemius, Maileon) and advertising networks (Adform) with a consent management platform (CPEX CMP) for GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive carousels and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider was explicitly identified. The technical stack supports the business model but could benefit from modernization in accessibility and security implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jenprocasopisy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jenprocasopisy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.