Skip to main content

Security report for jelgavasklinika.lv

Jelgavas klīnika · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jelgavas klīnika is a healthcare clinic based in Jelgava, Latvia, offering a wide range of medical services including diagnostics, medical commissions, radiology, and specialized procedures such as laser treatments and cardiology. The clinic targets the general public in Jelgava and surrounding areas, positioning itself as a trusted local healthcare provider. The website is built on WordPress using modern themes and plugins, with a good level of technical maturity including mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a responsible approach to data protection. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image with clear contact information and active social media engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jelgavasklinika.lv

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
85
Email security
88
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic operates in the healthcare sector with a medium-sized business model focused on direct patient services. It leverages digital channels for appointment booking and patient communication. The presence of structured data and social media links indicates an understanding of digital marketing and customer engagement. The business appears stable with consistent domain registration and no suspicious patterns. However, there is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies, and no advanced certifications or security policies are publicly disclosed. The clinic's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service offering and local market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP) and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) suggests room for improvement. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of up-to-date libraries reduces vulnerability risk, but continuous monitoring and security hardening are recommended to maintain a strong security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy or contact channel to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated software.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jelgavas klīnika
Description
Mūsu medicīnas speciālisti rūpējas par Jūsu veselību!
Key services
Medical commissions, Diagnostics, Medical examinations, Radiology, Ultrasound, Laboratory tests, Laser procedures, Orthopedics, Cardiology, Neurology
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Nimble Builder plugin, Customizr Pro theme, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a healthcare clinic in Jelgava, Latvia.
  2. Clear contact information and social media presence.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and themes.
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
  6. Security headers could be improved.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with the Customizr Pro theme and Nimble Builder plugin, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI components and Google Fonts for typography. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Hosting details are limited but name servers suggest a managed hosting provider. There is no evidence of advanced caching or CDN usage in the provided data. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and accessibility improvements could be prioritized to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jelgavasklinika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jelgavasklinika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.