Skip to main content

Security report for jelgava-psihoterapija.lv

dr. SOLVITA LAUVA · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a small private psychotherapy practice operated by dr. Solvita Lauva, a certified psychotherapist in Jelgava, Latvia. The business offers psychodynamic psychotherapy and related psychological services, targeting individuals facing mental health challenges such as depression, anxiety, and relationship issues. The site content is primarily informational, with contact details limited to a phone number and physical address. The website is built with basic HTML and JavaScript, lacking modern CMS or frameworks, and does not implement HTTPS for resource loading, which poses security concerns. From a technical perspective, the site uses legacy web technologies with no evident mobile optimization or accessibility enhancements. There are no forms or interactive elements, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating low digital maturity and potential GDPR compliance gaps. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS and missing security headers, increasing risk exposure. Overall, the website is functional for basic informational purposes but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to meet current standards. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the site content aligns with a legitimate healthcare provider profile. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and improving user engagement features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jelgava-psihoterapija.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jelgava-psihoterapija.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jelgava-psihoterapija.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small, local psychotherapy private practice with a clear focus on mental health services in Jelgava, Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in the certification and experience of dr. Solvita Lauva, offering psychodynamic psychotherapy. The business model is service-based, relying on direct client consultations. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The website serves as a basic digital presence without advanced marketing or analytics tools, indicating limited digital marketing efforts. Growth potential may be constrained by the lack of online engagement and modern digital infrastructure.

Security posture

The current security posture is minimal. The website lacks HTTPS for all resources, exposing users to potential interception risks. No security headers are detected, and there are no visible forms to assess input security. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web security risks and requires urgent improvements to protect user data and comply with regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement full HTTPS across the website and update all resource URLs to use HTTPS.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide a contact email address for better user communication and support.
  5. Modernize the website with responsive design and accessibility improvements to enhance user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
dr. SOLVITA LAUVA
Description
Privātprakse psihoterapijā Jelgavā, piedāvājot konsultācijas, individuālo psihoterapiju un psihologa, psihoterapeita pakalpojumus. Terapijas veids: psihodinamiskā psihoterapija. Darba pieredze vairāk nekā 10 gadi.
Key services
psihodinamiskā psihoterapija, individuālā psihoterapija, psihologa un psihoterapeita konsultācijas
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small private psychotherapy practice site in Latvian language.
  2. No HTTPS detected in resource URLs, indicating potential security risk.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact email found, only phone number and physical address.
  5. No social media links or analytics scripts detected.
  6. Site uses older style HTML with absolute positioning and inline styles.
  7. No modern CMS or frameworks detected.
  8. No forms present on the site for direct user input.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without any modern frameworks or CMS detected. The site uses absolute positioning and inline styles, indicating legacy design practices. External resources are loaded over HTTP, which is a security risk. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, suggesting minimal data collection. The site performance is moderate but likely impacted by outdated design and lack of optimization. Mobile optimization is poor, and accessibility features are minimal. There is an opportunity to modernize the technical stack to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jelgava-psihoterapija.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jelgava-psihoterapija.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.