Skip to main content

Security report for jekabaseta.lv

Jēkaba Sēta · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jēkaba Sēta is a small hospitality business operating a hotel-restaurant in Kuldīga, Latvia, established in 2014. The website presents the business offerings including accommodation, dining, and SPA services with a focus on local visitors and tourists. The site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR is implemented. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jekabaseta.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets the hospitality sector in Latvia, focusing on hotel and restaurant services with additional SPA amenities. It has a clear local market presence and a growing reputation since 2014. The business model relies on direct bookings and partnerships with platforms like Booking.com. The website content and structure support customer engagement and service promotion. The absence of explicit contact details on the main page may limit direct customer communication. The use of cookie consent and analytics tools shows awareness of privacy and marketing needs. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls, reflecting good privacy compliance. However, no advanced security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page suggests limited formal security communication. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jēkaba Sēta
Description
Viesnīca-restorāns Jēkaba sēta is a hotel-restaurant located in Kuldīga, Latvia, offering cozy rooms, a restaurant, a small SPA zone including steam and Finnish saunas, and views of the pedestrian street Liepājas iela. Established in summer 2014, it has grown in popularity and continuously invests in design and customer experience.
Key services
Hotel rooms, Restaurant, SPA services, Saunas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor 3.11.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes cookie consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based hotel-restaurant site in Latvia
  2. Content is in Latvian language
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  6. No visible security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure pages
  7. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  9. No advertising networks detected beyond analytics and tag manager
  10. Site uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern fonts and CSS techniques. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or errors. Cookie consent is managed by CookieYes plugin with detailed user preferences. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small hospitality business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jekabaseta.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jekabaseta.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.