Skip to main content

Security report for jeantet.ch

Fondation Louis-Jeantet · Healthcare · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fondation Louis-Jeantet is a Geneva-based non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting biomedical research, both fundamental and clinical, to advance medicine and foster innovation throughout researchers' careers. The foundation organizes awards, public conferences, and provides venue rental services, positioning itself as a reputable entity within the biomedical research community. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and content relevant to its mission, targeting researchers and the scientific community. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common libraries such as jQuery and OwlCarousel, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks some security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no visible cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts. WHOIS data confirms legitimacy with consistent registrant information matching the foundation's identity and location in Switzerland.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jeantet.ch

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on biomedical research funding and promotion. Its business model revolves around grant-making, awards, and public engagement through events. The website reflects a small-sized organization with a consistent brand and trust indicators such as contact details and social media presence. The foundation maintains partnerships with event organizers and digital service providers but no subsidiaries or parent companies are indicated. Growth indicators include active event promotion and recent conference listings. The foundation's market position is stable within the biomedical research philanthropic landscape.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which may limit transparency and readiness. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite using tracking scripts suggests partial GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy publication and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fondation Louis-Jeantet
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fondation Louis-Jeantet
Description
Basée à Genève, la Fondation Louis-Jeantet soutient la recherche biomédicale, fondamentale ou clinique, pour faire avancer la médecine, encourageant l’innovation à toutes les étapes de la carrière des chercheurs.
Key services
Research funding, Biomedical awards, Public conferences, Event hosting and venue rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, OwlCarousel, RoyalSlider, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is primarily in French with English alternate available
  3. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage
  4. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and Bluesky
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite use of tracking scripts
  6. Clear contact information with phone, email, and physical address
  7. No visible security or incident response policies published
  8. Use of WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries
  9. Good mobile responsiveness and navigation clarity
  10. No suspicious or malicious external links detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a combination of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, OwlCarousel, and RoyalSlider for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are integrated for user tracking and analytics. The site loads CSS and JS resources from both its own domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility is basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and alternate language links but could be improved with richer structured data. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small non-profit organization but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jeantet.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jeantet.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.