Skip to main content

Security report for jaybeeconsulting.ch

JayBee AG · Finance · Switzerland

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JayBee AG is a Swiss-based consulting firm specializing in simplifying regulatory and compliance processes for sectors including Fintech, Crypto, Banking, and Asset Management. The company positions itself as a goal-oriented partner providing pragmatic and innovative solutions to empower business success. Their website reflects a niche market focus with professional branding and client testimonials that enhance trust. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates SEO and analytics tools such as Rank Math and Google Tag Manager, indicating a modern digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but could be improved by adding security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy present, but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is accessible, professional, and trustworthy with moderate user tracking and good content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaybeeconsulting.ch

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
52
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JayBee AG operates in the finance consulting sector, targeting startups and established companies in Fintech, Crypto, Banking, Asset Management, and educational institutions. Their business model revolves around regulatory and compliance advisory services, leveraging practical experience and technology integration. The company maintains a small size with a focused market niche in Switzerland. Their competitive advantage lies in combining regulatory expertise with pragmatic implementation and digitalization support. The presence of client testimonials and structured data enhances credibility. The company’s digital presence is mature, though there is room for improvement in privacy and security transparency. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, and no suspicious domains or partners were detected.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. There is no published security or incident response policy, nor a vulnerability disclosure program, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and analytics introduces moderate user tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a consulting firm but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve site security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear incident response and security policy page including contact channels for security issues.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JayBee AG
Description
Simplify regulatory & compliance for Fintech, Crypto, Banking & Asset Management. Goal-oriented solutions to empower your business success.
Key services
Regulatory guidance for Fintech & Crypto, Banking institution compliance, Asset manager process optimization, Educational institution knowledge sharing, RegTech and software compliance integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Rank Math SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on regulatory and compliance consulting for finance sectors.
  3. No direct email or phone contact found on homepage; contact form is primary contact method.
  4. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. Use of modern CMS and SEO tools indicates digital maturity.
  6. Security headers are missing which could improve security posture.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Client testimonials add trustworthiness.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, enhanced with Rank Math SEO for optimization and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and widely supported, facilitating ease of maintenance and scalability. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for compliance and security hardening. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaybeeconsulting.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaybeeconsulting.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.