Skip to main content

Security report for jaunskunga.lv

Jaunskunga · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaunskunga.lv is a Latvian legal services website offering professional juridical consultations and services primarily targeting private individuals and businesses. The site positions itself as a reliable and responsible partner in areas such as real estate law, debt collection, contract disputes, and labor law. The business appears to be a small local service provider with a clear focus on legal assistance. Technically, the website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's hosting and content management infrastructure. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent and privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the website content and structure appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, the site is functional and relevant for its target audience but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaunskunga.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves the legal services sector in Latvia, focusing on real estate, debt recovery, contract law, and labor law. It targets both private persons and business clients, indicating a B2B and B2C hybrid model. The business model is service-oriented, with revenue likely generated from client consultations and legal representation. The site branding is consistent and professional, though trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials are not evident. The lack of contact details and privacy policies may impact client confidence. The platform's use of Wix suggests a small to medium-sized operation with limited technical resources. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the domain or content. Growth potential may depend on improving digital presence and compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications is found. The site does not display privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No analytics or third-party tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits marketing insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing recommended headers, privacy notices, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and client trust.
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses for security reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaunskunga
Description
Ikvienam var pienkākt brīdis, kad ir nepieciešami profesionāla un atbildīgi jurista pakalpojumi - vai tas ir namu apsaimniekošanas, tiesvedības vai citā jomā. Tajā brīdī ir nepieciešams uzticams, atbildīgs un neatlaidīgs partneris - Jaunskunga.lv
Key services
Nekustamā īpašuma tiesības, Parādu piedziņa un pārstāvība tiesā, Saistību tiesības - līgumi un strīdi, Darba tiesības un tiesas procesi, Juridiskie pakalpojumi un konsultācijas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com, core-js, focus-within-polyfill
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with typical Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website content is in Latvian language targeting local legal service clients.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. No social media links or external business partner domains found.
  9. Content is professional and relevant to legal services.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's content delivery network and standard polyfills for browser compatibility. The technology stack includes core-js and focus-within-polyfill scripts, indicating support for legacy browsers. The site uses modern image formats (AVIF) for performance optimization. However, no advanced frameworks or analytics tools are detected. The site demonstrates moderate loading performance and good mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are basic, with some focus management but no explicit ARIA landmarks or roles beyond standard HTML5. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no advanced structured data beyond a simple WebSite schema. The site would benefit from enhanced accessibility, SEO, and performance tuning to improve user experience and search rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaunskunga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaunskunga.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.