Skip to main content

Security report for jaunpilsalus.lv

Jaunpils alus · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaunpils alus is a small Latvian brewery established in 2017, specializing in producing and selling various types of beer and related products. The company operates a local retail and hospitality business model, offering products for takeaway and on-site consumption, as well as tours and tastings. The website reflects a focused local business with clear contact information and a privacy policy, targeting mature audiences interested in craft beer. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, hosted on a CMS platform with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and CAPTCHA on forms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaunpilsalus.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business positions itself as a local craft brewery with a niche market in Latvia, offering a range of beer products and related gift items. Its competitive advantage lies in its artisanal approach and local presence. Revenue streams include direct sales, on-site consumption, and tours. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook and partners with local service providers for website development and information services. Growth indicators include product variety and engagement through events. The business ecosystem is primarily local with no evident subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA protection on contact forms. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating potential gaps in security governance. Data protection practices are partially addressed via privacy policy and cookie consent, but no dedicated security or incident contacts are found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy or contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to build trust and legal clarity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaunpils alus
Description
Maza alus darītava Jaunpilī, kur alus darīšana notiek mūsdienīgās iekārtās ar kvalitatīvām izejvielām, tādā veidā iegūstot izsapņoto alus garšu. Alus darītava savu darbību ir uzsākusi 2017. gada maijā. Piedāvā alu līdzņemšanai un baudīšanai uz vietas. Produkcija ietver dažādus alu veidus un alus izstrādājumus, kā arī dāvanas un alus trīspakas.
Key services
alus ražošana, alus pārdošana līdzņemšanai, alus baudīšana uz vietas, alus ekskursijas un degustācijas, alus izstrādājumu un dāvanu pārdošana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Mapbox, Snowplow Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CAPTCHA in contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. Clear contact information including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Privacy policy and cookie consent are implemented and accessible.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. Business is a small local brewery with a focus on retail and hospitality.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform (likely Multiscreensite) using jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Mapbox for geolocation, and Snowplow for analytics tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources asynchronously for performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport settings. SEO is supported by meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Accessibility is basic with standard HTML semantics but no explicit ARIA roles detected. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in CSS loading and script management. No hosting provider details were found in the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaunpilsalus.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaunpilsalus.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.