Skip to main content

Security report for jaunaraji.lv

Jaunarāji · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaunarāji is a small hospitality business located in Latvia offering camping and recreational services including rental of cottages, sauna, and banquet facilities by the Gauja river. The website provides basic information about the business, contact details, and a photo gallery showcasing the facilities. The technical infrastructure relies on older web technologies such as jQuery 1.4.4 and Google Maps API v2, indicating a need for modernization. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement and modern security headers, which poses risks to user data and trust. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, reducing compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with moderate trustworthiness based on available contact information and business description.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaunaraji.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector targeting local and regional visitors interested in nature-based recreation. Its business model centers on accommodation and event hosting services. The website does not reveal detailed business metrics or partnerships, but the presence of a contact phone and email suggests a direct customer engagement approach. The lack of social media presence and limited digital marketing tools indicates a low digital maturity level. The company appears to be a small, independent operator without subsidiaries or parent company affiliations.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities, and lack of security headers. No evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies was found. The site uses client-side form validation only, which is insufficient for robust security. Google Analytics is implemented without visible cookie consent, raising privacy compliance concerns. The overall security score is low, and improvements are necessary to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries and APIs to current supported versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Add and clearly display privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Implement server-side validation for all forms and consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaunarāji
Description
Kempings "Jaunarāji" offers accommodation and recreational services by the Gauja river including 8-person cottages, a sauna for up to 20 people, and a banquet hall.
Key services
Accommodation in cottages, Sauna rental, Banquet hall rental, Camping and outdoor activities
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.4.4, Google Maps API v2, Lightbox gallery, SmoothDivScroll
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
35/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Basic form validation via JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is present but limited to email and phone without physical address.
  4. Site uses outdated technologies and lacks HTTPS enforcement.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. Content is focused on hospitality services in Latvia with local target audience.
  8. No social media links or advanced business certifications found.
  9. No forms with personal data collection detected in the HTML content.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML head.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy technologies including jQuery 1.4.4 and Google Maps API v2, which are deprecated and pose security risks. The site lacks a modern CMS or framework and shows no evidence of mobile optimization or accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with updated tech stack and responsive design. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaunaraji.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaunaraji.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.