Skip to main content

Security report for jarvisexchange.com

iEXExchanger FZCO · Finance · United Arab Emirates

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JARVIS Exchange, operated by iEXExchanger FZCO, is a cryptocurrency and fiat currency exchange platform primarily targeting Russian-speaking users. The platform offers services including crypto-to-fiat exchange, mass payments, and API integration, positioning itself as a reliable and established player with over 3 years of operation and positive user feedback. The website is built on a modern Angular framework, leveraging Cloudflare DNS and Google Fonts, and includes interactive features such as a live chat widget and Telegram support bot. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, CSRF tokens, and domain transfer protection, although DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit incident response contacts are publicly listed. Overall, the platform demonstrates a moderate to good security posture and technical maturity, with room for improvement in transparency and DNS security. The website content is professional, well-structured, and free from adult or questionable content, making it suitable for a general audience interested in cryptocurrency exchange services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jarvisexchange.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the finance sector, focusing on cryptocurrency exchange services with a medium-sized operational scale. It maintains partnerships with reputable crypto monitoring and review platforms such as BestChange, TrustPilot, and BitcoinTalk, enhancing its market credibility. The business model revolves around facilitating crypto and fiat currency exchanges, mass payments, and providing API access for integration. The target audience includes individual traders and businesses in Russian-speaking regions. The company leverages digital marketing tools including Telegram bots and chat widgets to engage customers. The domain age and registration details align with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. However, the absence of publicly available incident response contacts and security.txt files suggests an opportunity to strengthen trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Cloudflare DNS services, which provide baseline protection against common web threats. Security best practices observed include the use of CSRF tokens and domain transfer lock status. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options or Content-Security-Policy were detected in the HTML source, which could be improved. The lack of a published security.txt or incident response contact information limits the platform's readiness for coordinated vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by adopting additional DNS and HTTP security measures and improving transparency around security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file with clear incident response and abuse contact information.
  3. Implement and explicitly declare security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide publicly accessible incident response and abuse email contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iEXExchanger FZCO
Description
Надежный обмен криптовалют по выгодному курсу. Продажа, обмен криптовалют в обменном сервисе электронных валют JARVIS Exchange. 3 года безупречной работы, >1000 отзывов.
Key services
Cryptocurrency exchange, Fiat currency exchange, Mass payments, API for exchange, AML/KYC compliance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 18.2.12, Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts (Roboto), JivoSite chat widget, Custom CSS and JS bundles
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and protection
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
JivoSite chat widget
Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Telegram bots
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with some English localization.
  3. Business is a cryptocurrency and fiat currency exchange platform.
  4. Multiple external partnerships and positive user reviews are present.
  5. Security practices are good but could be improved with DNSSEC and security.txt.
  6. No explicit privacy or incident response emails found in public content.
  7. Use of modern Angular framework and Cloudflare DNS.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 18.2.12, indicating a modern and maintainable frontend framework. It uses Cloudflare for DNS management, which provides performance and security benefits. The site loads Google Fonts for typography and integrates a third-party chat widget (JivoSite) for customer support. The presence of CSRF tokens and structured meta tags suggests attention to security and SEO. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and stylesheets. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and viewport settings. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph properties, and alternate language links. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jarvisexchange.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jarvisexchange.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.