Skip to main content

Security report for japanesefarting.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website japanesefarting.com operates as a niche adult entertainment platform specializing in free streaming of Japanese and Asian pornographic videos. It offers categorized video content with user registration and upload features, monetized primarily through advertising. The site targets an adults-only audience interested in Japanese adult content. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies including jQuery 1.12.0 and Google Fonts, hosted on HostiServices. The design and user experience are functional but basic, with moderate mobile optimization and SEO. Security posture is weak, lacking HTTPS enforcement details, security headers, and using outdated JavaScript libraries, exposing potential vulnerabilities. Privacy and compliance policies are absent, and no contact or business transparency information is provided, reducing trustworthiness. The domain registration is consistent with the site's age but lacks registrant details. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to security and compliance gaps and limited business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching japanesefarting.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche in the adult media sector, focusing on Japanese and Asian adult video content. Its business model relies on free content supported by advertising, with a network of related partner sites. The lack of privacy and terms policies, as well as absence of contact information, suggests a low level of formal business structure and compliance. The target market is adults seeking free Japanese adult videos. Growth potential may be limited by poor compliance and security posture. The partner ecosystem includes multiple similar adult sites, indicating a networked approach to content distribution.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The site lacks critical security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version vulnerable to exploits. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or secure cookie handling. No privacy or incident response policies are published, and no security contact channels are provided. These gaps expose the site and its users to potential risks including data interception, cross-site scripting, and lack of accountability in case of incidents. The domain status clientTransferProhibited is a positive control against unauthorized domain transfers but does not compensate for other weaknesses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and enforce it site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance considerations.
  3. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies with clear contact information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing free streaming of Japanese adult videos categorized by various genres and tags.
Key services
Free adult video streaming, Video categorization and search, User registration and login, Video upload functionality
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.0, Google Fonts (Open Sans), HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
tsyndicate.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content streaming platform focused on Japanese and Asian pornographic videos.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating poor compliance posture.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided, limiting business credibility.
  4. Site uses outdated jQuery version and lacks security headers, exposing potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Advertising is present via tsyndicate.com iframes, but no clear tracking or analytics services detected.
  6. Site offers user registration and login forms but no visible security or privacy disclosures.
  7. Domain WHOIS data is consistent but lacks registrant transparency.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery 1.12.0, along with Google Fonts. Hosting is via HostiServices as indicated by nameservers. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO meta tags. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces security risks. No modern frameworks or CMS are detected. Performance is moderate with some embedded iframes for advertising. Accessibility features are minimal. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking services. The site could benefit from modernization and improved technical hygiene to enhance security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with japanesefarting.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review japanesefarting.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.