Skip to main content

Security report for janrothuizen.nl

Jan Rothuizen · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jan Rothuizen is a visual artist with an established online presence showcasing his artwork, including drawings, books, and interactive projects. The website serves both as a portfolio and an e-commerce platform, targeting art enthusiasts and collectors. The site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging modern web technologies and plugins to provide a functional and visually appealing user experience. Social media integration and active marketing tools like Mailchimp and Facebook Pixel support audience engagement and outreach. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements in security headers and explicit privacy policies are recommended. The domain is longstanding and consistent with the artist's career, enhancing trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching janrothuizen.nl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Jan Rothuizen as a niche artist with international recognition, offering original artworks, editions, and books primarily through direct sales. The business model is focused on direct-to-consumer e-commerce combined with cultural and artistic exhibitions. The target audience includes art collectors, cultural institutions, and the general public interested in visual arts and cartography. The site demonstrates consistent branding and professional content, supported by a small but focused digital infrastructure. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating a sole proprietorship or independent artist operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of basic security and privacy requirements. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and common security headers are not explicitly detected, which could expose the site to certain risks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The WooCommerce login form uses nonce tokens, enhancing form security. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance.
  4. Create a vulnerability disclosure or security policy page to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly update and audit WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jan Rothuizen
Description
Jan Rothuizen (1968) is a visual artist. His work has been translated into English, Spanish and Chinese. He made the interactive award-winning documentary “Refugee Republic” about a refugee camp in Iraq.
Key services
Art sales (editions, original drawings, books), Exhibitions and installations, Interactive projects and documentaries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, WooCommerce 10.0.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, GSAP, Lenis, Magnific Popup, Waypoints, Mailchimp for WooCommerce, WooCommerce Products Filter plugin, Flatsome theme
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled site
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in forms (WooCommerce login form)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional artist portfolio and e-commerce platform
  2. Uses WordPress with WooCommerce and multiple plugins
  3. Implements cookie consent and basic privacy mechanisms
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  5. Social media presence is active and linked
  6. No security blocking or WAF detected
  7. No suspicious or malicious content found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, supported by a range of plugins including Yoast SEO, Mailchimp integration, and product filtering tools. The theme 'Flatsome' provides responsive design and good user experience. JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, GSAP, Lenis, and Magnific Popup enhance interactivity. Performance is moderate with prefetching and CDN usage for fonts and scripts. Accessibility is basic but present, and SEO is supported by Yoast with proper meta tags and structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the domain is registered with Registrar.eu. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small artist business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with janrothuizen.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review janrothuizen.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.