Skip to main content

Security report for jameda.de

jameda · Healthcare · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

jameda.de is a leading German online healthcare platform specializing in doctor appointment bookings and patient feedback aggregation. It serves patients seeking medical professionals and healthcare providers looking to manage appointments and reputation. The platform is part of the Docplanner group, indicating a strong market position in the healthcare technology sector. The website demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure leveraging modern analytics, optimization, and consent management tools, hosted on Amazon AWS. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent, although public security policies and incident response contacts are not disclosed. Overall, jameda.de presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly digital presence with extensive healthcare service offerings.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jameda.de

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

jameda operates as an essential healthcare marketplace connecting patients and medical professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in a large database of verified patient reviews and seamless online appointment booking. The business model focuses on platform services, likely monetizing through premium listings and appointment facilitation. Target customers include German-speaking patients and healthcare providers. The platform's integration with Docplanner enhances its ecosystem and growth potential. Strategic partnerships and extensive use of analytics tools support data-driven marketing and service optimization. The absence of explicit contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on digital self-service. The company maintains strong branding consistency and trust signals through verified reviews and GDPR compliance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Use of reCAPTCHA and moderation gates indicates proactive measures against abuse. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and may impact incident handling readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score reflects good practices but highlights areas for improvement in policy disclosure and incident response communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Disclose data protection officer contact information to enhance GDPR transparency.
  5. Maintain continuous monitoring and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
jameda
Description
Online platform for booking doctor appointments and reading patient feedbacks. Offers search for specialists, clinics, and more with over 2 million verified patient reviews.
Key services
Online doctor appointment booking, Patient feedback and reviews, Doctor and clinic search
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, Algolia Search, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google reCAPTCHA, WebSockets
Platforms
Docplanner platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Security gates and feature toggles for GDPR and moderation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer, HubSpot
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  3. Use of modern analytics and optimization tools.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML.
  5. Business is part of Docplanner group, a known healthcare platform.
  6. No public security policy or incident response contacts found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
  8. High quality and professional website design and content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, and Algolia search integration. Hosting on AWS ensures scalability and reliability. The site is optimized for fast loading and excellent mobile responsiveness. SEO is enhanced through structured JSON-LD data and Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are present but could be further improved with explicit ARIA roles and landmarks. The technical implementation supports a seamless user experience and robust data collection for marketing and analytics purposes. Opportunities exist to enhance technical documentation and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jameda.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jameda.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.