Skip to main content

Security report for jakprezitdluhy.cz

Jak přežít dluhy · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jak přežít dluhy is a Czech Republic based small business specializing in debt advisory services, including assistance with executions and debt relief. The website offers free expert consultation targeting individuals struggling with expensive loans or execution proceedings. The business operates primarily in the finance sector and has been active since 2017. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO for optimization and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks published privacy policies, terms of service, and security headers, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could enhance compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jakprezitdluhy.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jakprezitdluhy.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jakprezitdluhy.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche debt advisory service in the Czech market, offering free counseling to individuals facing financial difficulties. Its business model revolves around providing expert advice and possibly generating leads for debt relief solutions. The website's content and structured data reflect a focused approach on finance and legal advisory. The use of third-party services like Airtable, Amazon, Canva, and Mailchimp suggests integration with common SaaS tools for operations and marketing. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage may indicate a lead capture or contact form approach elsewhere on the site. The company appears stable with consistent domain registration and hosting.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a reputable cookie consent management platform (Cookiebot), which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies was found, which could be a gap in security governance. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, which is standard practice. Security best practices could be improved by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and conducting regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jak přežít dluhy
Description
Pomoc s exekucemi a dluhy. Odborné poradenství zdarma.
Key services
Debt counseling, Advice on executions, Debt relief consultation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Cookiebot CMP, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for optimization
  2. Cookiebot CMP is implemented for cookie consent management
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content
  5. Site content is in Czech language targeting Czech audience
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  8. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  9. External links mostly to trusted service providers and analytics tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-friendly infrastructure. Cookiebot CMP is integrated for cookie consent, showing compliance efforts. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. Hosting is provided by REG-ZONER, a known Czech hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and branding consistency. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of published compliance documents. Opportunities exist to improve performance and security through optimization and policy publication.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jakprezitdluhy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jakprezitdluhy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.