Skip to main content

Security report for jadprolive.com

Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JADPRO Live is a specialized educational event platform targeting advanced practitioners in oncology, providing professional training and development opportunities. The website reflects a niche market position focused on healthcare education, with content tailored to oncology professionals. The business model centers around event hosting and educational services, with a domain age consistent with an established presence since 2014. Technically, the site employs a variety of modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Matomo, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The hosting is managed via GoDaddy, and the site uses HTTPS with domain status protections but lacks DNSSEC, which could be improved for enhanced DNS security. Security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected but missing security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service policies reduce compliance and trust levels. No contact emails or phone numbers were found in the provided content, limiting direct communication channels. Overall, the site is professional and safe, with good content quality and user experience but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jadprolive.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jadprolive.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform serves a specialized segment within healthcare education, focusing on oncology advanced practitioners. Its competitive advantage lies in its niche focus and event-based educational offerings. Revenue streams likely include event registrations and sponsorships. The target audience is healthcare professionals seeking advanced oncology education. The presence of multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies may hinder trust and user confidence. Partnerships with advertising and analytics providers are evident, but no direct business partner domains were identified. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and professional content, supporting its market position as a reputable educational event organizer.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections that prevent unauthorized domain modifications. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of published privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR and general data protection best practices. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  4. Publish explicit incident response and abuse contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Review and audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
An Educational Event for Advanced Practitioners in Oncology
Key services
Educational event, Oncology practitioner training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Matomo Analytics, jQuery, JW Player, AdRoll, Microsoft Clarity
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an educational event platform for oncology advanced practitioners.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found in the HTML content.
  3. Multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts are used.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Domain is secured with HTTPS and has domain status protections but lacks DNSSEC.
  8. Website uses common marketing and tracking technologies.
  9. Content is professional and targeted to healthcare professionals.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with popular analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity, and AdRoll for retargeting. It loads jQuery and JW Player for media content. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize page load times. Mobile optimization is good, and basic accessibility features are present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. No CMS was explicitly detected from the provided content. The site would benefit from improved technical SEO and accessibility enhancements to increase reach and usability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jadprolive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jadprolive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.