Skip to main content

Security report for j1-info.de

Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG) · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.j1-info.de is an official public health information portal managed by the Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG) in Germany. It provides comprehensive information about the J1 health check for adolescents aged 12 to 14, including educational content, appointment scheduling assistance, and a doctor search feature. The site targets youth, their parents, and healthcare professionals, positioning itself as a trusted government resource in the healthcare sector. The content is well-structured, multilingual, and includes accessible media, enhancing user engagement and inclusivity. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, employs Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics, and uses modern web technologies including accessible video players and responsive design. The website demonstrates good performance and SEO practices, with strong accessibility features. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed, but data processing for analytics is localized in Germany, aligning with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, anonymizes IP addresses in analytics, and implements a clear cookie consent mechanism. While some security headers like Content-Security-Policy are not explicitly found, the overall posture is strong with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is excellent, with detailed policies and user consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with high trustworthiness, serving as a professional and reliable source of health information for its audience. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers and publishing explicit security policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching j1-info.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention j1-info.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for j1-info.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a government-backed informational platform focused on adolescent health checks (J1) in Germany. Its market positioning is that of an authoritative public health resource, providing free educational content and practical tools such as appointment reminders and doctor locators. The business model is non-commercial, funded by public health institutions, targeting adolescents and their caregivers. The site leverages partnerships with recognized health organizations and integrates external trusted domains for extended information. Growth indicators include multilingual support and interactive features like FAQs and contact forms. The platform's ecosystem is tightly aligned with government health initiatives, ensuring credibility and broad reach within its niche.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, anonymized analytics data, and a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Referrer-Policy suggests room for improvement. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to demonstrate readiness and transparency. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment appropriate for a government health information portal, minimizing risks to users and data integrity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, Referrer-Policy, and X-Frame-Options headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  4. Enhance contact information by adding verified phone numbers or physical addresses if applicable.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG)
Description
Informationsangebot rund um den Gesundheits-Check für Jugendliche von 12 bis 14 Jahren, inklusive Beratung und Terminvereinbarung.
Key services
Information about J1 health check, Appointment reminder and scheduling assistance, Doctor search for J1 examinations, Educational videos and FAQs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Matomo Analytics, AblePlayer (accessible media player), Bootstrap (accordion and UI components), JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No cookies set without consent
  • IP anonymization in analytics
  • Consent banner for tracking
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-backed public health information portal.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and targeted at youth and parents.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. Use of accessible media player and multilingual support enhances inclusivity.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. No direct phone numbers or physical addresses found on the site.
  7. Contact primarily via email and contact form.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system suitable for government and institutional websites. It uses Matomo analytics configured for privacy compliance, including IP anonymization and no cookie storage without consent. The site employs accessible media players (AblePlayer) and responsive design techniques, ensuring usability across devices and for users with disabilities. The codebase includes modern JavaScript and CSS assets, with deferred loading for performance optimization. Hosting details are not explicit, but analytics data is processed locally in Germany, aligning with data protection laws. The site demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, though some security headers are missing, which should be addressed to reduce technical risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with j1-info.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review j1-info.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.