Skip to main content

Security report for izodom2000polska.com

Izodom 2000 Polska · Energy · Poland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Izodom 2000 Polska is a well-established Polish company specializing in the production of styrofoam blocks and complete building systems for energy-efficient and passive houses. With over 20 years of market presence, the company offers a proprietary technology that supports quick and affordable construction. Their target audience includes construction contractors, architects, and individuals interested in modern, energy-saving building solutions. The website reflects a medium-sized business with consistent branding and a good level of content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching izodom2000polska.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a key player in the energy-efficient construction sector, offering a broad product catalog and training for professionals. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and direct delivery of building elements, supported by European certifications and awards that enhance trust. The multilingual website and European quality claims indicate a strategy targeting both domestic and international markets. The presence of Google Ads and analytics suggests active marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit privacy or security policies highlights gaps in their security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could be a risk in case of security events. The use of legacy technologies like Cufon font replacement may also indicate some technical debt. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility by adding verified company emails and phone numbers on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Izodom 2000 Polska
Description
Producer of styrofoam blocks for building passive and energy-efficient houses. Offers a complete system for low-energy and passive house construction including foundations, walls, and roofs with modern technology.
Key services
Production of styrofoam blocks, Complete building system for passive houses, Delivery of building elements, Training and support for architects and contractors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery, Cufon font replacement
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Stat24
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Stat24
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with multilingual support.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  3. WHOIS data confirms long domain age and stable registration.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers visible on homepage; contact form present.
  5. Use of older font replacement technology (Cufon) indicates some legacy code.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  7. Google Analytics and Google Ads scripts present for tracking and marketing.
  8. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery and Cufon for font rendering. Hosting is provided by dhosting.pl, and the domain is registered with NameSilo, LLC. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO practices in place. The use of older font replacement technology suggests some legacy code that could be modernized. Analytics and marketing scripts are integrated, but no advanced frameworks or CMS are detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with izodom2000polska.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review izodom2000polska.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.