Skip to main content

Security report for izodom.com

IZODOM · Energy · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IZODOM is a specialized company focused on manufacturing and providing building blocks and technology for energy-efficient and passive houses. The company has a strong market position in the energy-efficient construction sector, offering innovative solutions such as the IZOClick® system that eliminates thermal bridges. The website targets individual customers, contractors, developers, and architects interested in sustainable building technologies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern plugins for performance and GDPR compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though it could improve SEO and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching izodom.com

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
100
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IZODOM operates in the energy and real estate sectors, focusing on green building materials and technologies. The business model revolves around product sales and consultation services for energy-efficient construction. The company has been established since 2005, indicating maturity and stability. The website supports multiple languages and links to partner sites in various countries, suggesting an international presence. Customer testimonials and structured data enhance trust and credibility. The company leverages modern web technologies but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security policies to strengthen market competitiveness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and clientTransferProhibited domain status. However, it lacks a Content Security Policy and security.txt file, which are important for mitigating risks and enabling responsible vulnerability disclosure. No incident response or security policies are publicly available. Forms are secured via HTTPS but no explicit anti-CSRF or input validation details are visible. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting and other injection attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security transparency.
  3. Develop and publish incident response and security policies accessible from the website.
  4. Enhance SEO by adjusting robots meta tags to allow indexing and improving sitemap presence.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IZODOM
Description
Complete IZODOM technology for the construction of energy-efficient and passive houses. Building materials for fast construction without mortar and thermal bridges.
Key services
Energy-efficient house building blocks, Insulated foundation slabs, Solid concrete walls with IZOClick® system, Consultation and advisory services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, WP Rocket, Complianz GDPR plugin, EWWW Image Optimizer, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear focus on energy-efficient building blocks.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with multi-language support.
  3. No explicit terms of service found.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled found.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies indicates active maintenance.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found, which is a gap for security transparency.
  7. SEO is basic with meta tags and structured data but robots meta tag is set to noindex,nofollow which may limit search engine indexing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, using jQuery and modern plugins like WP Rocket for caching and Complianz for GDPR compliance. Hosting is managed via Key-Systems GmbH with DNS servers at home.pl. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and CDN usage for media assets. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. However, SEO is limited by noindex,nofollow robots meta tag. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and labels but could be improved. No major technical debt detected but security headers and SEO optimizations are areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with izodom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review izodom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.