Skip to main content

Security report for ixxx.com

iXXX · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iXXX is an adult media website offering a large collection of free and premium pornographic videos across numerous categories and featuring many pornstars. The site targets adult users seeking diverse adult content and operates primarily on an advertising-supported model with optional premium memberships. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and extensive content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and business credibility. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ixxx.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a strong position in the adult media sector as a large free porn video tube with premium options. Its business model relies on high traffic volume monetized through advertising and memberships. The extensive categorization and search features indicate a focus on user engagement and content discoverability. Lack of visible company or contact information limits trust and may impact partnerships or regulatory compliance. The use of Google Tag Manager suggests standard marketing and analytics practices. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. Growth potential exists but is constrained by compliance and trust factors.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure content delivery. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms were found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No contact channels for incident response or abuse reporting are visible, limiting responsiveness to security incidents. The site uses tracking scripts which may impact user privacy. Overall, the security posture requires enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security and abuse reporting channels to improve incident response.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and business credibility.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iXXX
Description
iXXX is a website providing free pornographic video content, hosting a large collection of adult videos across multiple categories and featuring numerous pornstars.
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Premium membership content, Search and browse adult videos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical URL https://www.ixxx.com/)
  • Use of async scripts to improve performance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large adult video streaming platform with extensive categories and content
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, raising legitimacy concerns
  7. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern front-end stack with asynchronous JavaScript loading and CSS for styling. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with preconnect and dns-prefetch hints for external domains to improve loading times. No CMS or backend technologies were identified from the HTML. Hosting provider details are not available. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ixxx.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ixxx.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.