Skip to main content

Security report for iverwind.com

Iver · Energy · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Iver is a Dutch company specializing in wind turbine services, offering tailored maintenance, repair, and component replacement solutions to maximize wind turbine performance and minimize downtime. With 25 years of industry experience, Iver positions itself as a trusted full-service partner in the renewable energy sector, serving clients primarily in the Netherlands and across Europe. Their business model includes service contracts, on-site assembly and disassembly, blade services, inspections, and a marketplace for spare parts. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with the Divi theme, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, and Hotjar. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear contact channels including phone, email, and a detailed contact form. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and clientTransferProhibited domain status, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC and security headers. Overall, the website is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, supporting Iver's market position as a specialist in wind energy services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iverwind.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Iver operates in the energy sector focusing on wind turbine maintenance and services. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive experience, comprehensive service offerings, and commitment to sustainability and safety standards. The company targets wind turbine operators and owners who require expert maintenance and rapid response to minimize operational downtime. Revenue streams likely include service contracts, component sales via their marketplace, and consulting services. The company maintains a multi-lingual website to cater to a broader European audience. Partnerships are evident through social media presence and possibly industry collaborations, though no explicit partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include a strong emphasis on sustainability and training, positioning Iver as a forward-looking player in the energy transition market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration status protects against unauthorized transfers. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms helps mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS represent areas for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security issues. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating good data protection practices. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use and maintain up-to-date software.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Iver
Description
Het hoogste rendement uit uw windmolens met deskundige service op maat voor maximale performance en minimale downtime.
Key services
Servicecontracten, Montage en demontage, Hoofdcomponenten verwisselen, Blade services, Inspectie en advies, Aanvullende diensten, Marketplace for spare parts
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Divi Theme, jQuery, MediaElement.js, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Popup Maker plugin, Autoptimize
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Privacy and cookie policies present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Popup Maker
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple service descriptions.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.
  3. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, and detailed contact form.
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools with consent mechanisms.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious content or domains.
  6. Good branding consistency and professional design.
  7. No explicit security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  8. DNSSEC not enabled; security headers not explicitly detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, which provides a professional and responsive design. The tech stack includes jQuery, MediaElement.js for media playback, and several marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Hotjar. Performance is moderate, with some optimization via Autoptimize plugin. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting appears to be via TransIP, a reputable provider. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to certain attacks. Overall, the infrastructure supports a stable and professional online presence with room for security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iverwind.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iverwind.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.