Skip to main content

Security report for istripper.com

Totem Core Limited · Media · Ireland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Totem Core Limited operates iStripper, a specialized adult entertainment platform offering erotic striptease software and streaming content for desktop and mobile users. The company targets an adult audience with a mature content offering, including nude models and pornographic videos. The platform is well-established with over 22 million downloads and a vibrant community. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, integrates analytics and chat services, and supports multiple languages and platforms. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and age verification, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response documentation. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, though no dedicated cookie policy page is found. The WHOIS data is missing, reducing domain trustworthiness, but the business information and trust signals on the site support legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional, professionally designed, and compliant with adult content regulations, but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching istripper.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iStripper holds a niche position in the adult entertainment software market, leveraging a subscription and software sales model. Its competitive advantage lies in exclusive content, high-quality 4K videos, and a strong community presence. The company benefits from partnerships and affiliate programs to expand reach. The target customers are adult users seeking desktop and mobile erotic entertainment. The business is medium-sized, founded in 1998, and based in Ireland. Revenue streams likely include software sales, subscriptions, and affiliate marketing. The company maintains active social media channels and integrates customer reviews to build trust. Growth indicators include multi-language support and mobile platform availability. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security transparency and privacy compliance to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and an age verification mechanism to restrict underage access. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or security policy pages are present, indicating potential gaps in security governance and readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the analysis. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking a dedicated cookie policy page. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced security controls, documentation, and user transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish explicit incident response and security policy documentation to improve governance and user trust.
  3. Develop and display a dedicated cookie policy page with clear consent mechanisms to enhance privacy compliance.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit WHOIS registration data and ensure domain registration transparency to strengthen legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Totem Core Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Totem Core Limited
Description
Totem Core Limited operates iStripper, a software platform offering erotic striptease shows and adult entertainment content for desktop and mobile devices. The business provides downloadable software and streaming services featuring nude models and pornstars, targeting adult users.
Key services
Desktop striptease software, Mobile streaming platform, Erotic video content, Community forum
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot Widget, Crisp Chat, Video.js
Platforms
Windows, Mac, Android, iOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Trustpilot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, OneSignal
Marketing tools
Trustpilot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website contains explicit adult content with age verification banner.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating privacy or registration issues.
  3. Professional design with multi-language support and community features.
  4. Uses multiple third-party services for analytics, chat, and reviews.
  5. No visible contact phone numbers; only email and physical address found.
  6. No explicit cookie policy page found, but cookie consent mechanism present.
  7. No visible security or incident response policy pages.
  8. Trustpilot reviews and payment logos enhance trust signals.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integrations including Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot widgets, Crisp chat, and Video.js for media playback. It supports multiple platforms including Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS through downloadable software and mobile streaming. Performance is moderate with responsive design and multi-language support. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, but lacks some advanced security headers. Analytics and tracking tools are employed moderately, with room for improved privacy transparency. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with istripper.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review istripper.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.