Skip to main content

Security report for istockphoto.com

iStockphoto LP · Media · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iStockphoto LP operates the iStock website, a leading digital marketplace offering millions of royalty-free stock images, videos, and vectors. The platform targets creative professionals and businesses seeking licensed media content for various projects. As a subsidiary of Getty Images, iStock holds a strong market position in the stock media industry, leveraging a subscription and credit-based licensing business model. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and user experience. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as AngularJS and uses Webpack for asset bundling. It integrates third-party services like OneTrust for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with fast loading times and basic accessibility features. However, explicit CMS or hosting provider details are not disclosed. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with CSRF protection and bot detection mechanisms. While some security headers are not explicitly observed, the overall posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through cookie consent, but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service links were found on this page. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual but likely due to privacy or registry policies rather than malicious intent. Overall, iStock presents a low-risk profile with a mature digital infrastructure and strong business credibility. Strategic improvements include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact information for security and compliance inquiries.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching istockphoto.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iStock operates as a major player in the digital stock media market, offering a vast library of royalty-free images and videos. Its business model combines subscription plans and credit purchases, catering to a broad audience of creative professionals and enterprises. The company benefits from its association with Getty Images, enhancing its market reach and trustworthiness. The website's technical sophistication and integration with marketing and consent tools indicate a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the absence of visible contact details and WHOIS transparency suggests areas for improvement in customer engagement and corporate transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, CSRF tokens, and bot detection features. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent indicates attention to privacy regulations. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and may hinder rapid response to security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is partially inferred but not explicitly documented on this page.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from all pages.
  2. Implement and document explicit security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for inclusivity.
  5. Increase transparency around data retention policies and user data handling.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iStockphoto LP
Description
iStock is a digital media marketplace offering millions of royalty-free stock files for creative projects, targeting users seeking licensed images and media content quickly.
Key services
Royalty-free stock images, Stock videos, Stock vectors, Subscription and credit-based licensing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, AngularJS (ng-app, ng-scope), Webpack, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present in meta tags
  • Bot detection mechanisms active

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found on this page, but cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are present on this page.
  4. Site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and has good SEO and mobile optimization.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual but not uncommon for large brands using privacy or registry protection.
  6. No adult or NSFW content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses AngularJS framework with modern JavaScript bundling via Webpack, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. Integration with OneTrust and Google Tag Manager shows a mature approach to privacy compliance and analytics. The site is mobile optimized and loads quickly, with proper meta tags for SEO. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. The absence of certain security headers suggests room for technical hardening. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable e-commerce platform for digital media licensing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with istockphoto.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review istockphoto.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.