Skip to main content

Security report for isidore-project.eu

ISIDORe project · Healthcare · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The ISIDORe project website serves as a professional platform offering integrated services for infectious disease outbreak research, primarily targeting researchers and public health professionals. Founded in 2020, the project focuses on advancing pandemic preparedness through specialized research services. The website is well-branded and consistent, presenting clear information about its mission and services. The presence of structured data and SEO optimizations enhances its digital visibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.3, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for consent management. Google Analytics is integrated with user consent, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and moderate performance, hosted under a reputable registrar, GANDI. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie declaration. However, the absence of terms of service and incident response information suggests areas for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, safe, and professionally maintained, with a solid foundation in privacy compliance and user experience. Strategic enhancements in security headers and transparency policies would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

    • High

      Weak DKIM Key

      DKIM selector 'google' uses 792-bit key

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching isidore-project.eu

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ISIDORe project occupies a niche in the healthcare and public health sector, focusing on infectious disease outbreak research and pandemic preparedness. Its business model revolves around providing integrated research services and infrastructure support to researchers. The project is relatively young, established in 2020, and operates as a small entity. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized expertise and collaboration with research communities. The website's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but social media presence on Twitter indicates engagement with the scientific community. Revenue streams and growth indicators are not publicly disclosed, typical for research projects funded by grants or public institutions.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is evident, but NIS2 or other frameworks are not mentioned. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance contact information availability by including verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use and maintain up-to-date software versions.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ISIDORe project
Description
We advance pandemic preparedness with services for researchers.
Key services
Integrated services for infectious disease outbreak research, Pandemic preparedness support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Cookiebot consent management, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot tracking pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern SEO and consent management plugins
  2. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with detailed cookie declarations
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet; contact likely via form or social media
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages detected
  5. Google Analytics is used with consent-based loading
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
  7. Website content is professional and targeted at researchers in infectious disease outbreak research
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with up-to-date core and plugins, including Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for consent management. Google Analytics is integrated with consent-based loading, reflecting privacy-conscious analytics usage. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. Hosting is managed via a reputable registrar, GANDI, but specific hosting infrastructure details are not disclosed. The technical stack is appropriate for the site's scope, with opportunities to improve security headers and streamline third-party dependencies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with isidore-project.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review isidore-project.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.