Skip to main content

Security report for isi.com

iSi GmbH · Energy · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iSi GmbH is a well-established global manufacturer specializing in pressurized gas chargers and related solutions across automotive, components, and culinary sectors. Founded in 1867 in Vienna, the company has a strong market presence with operations in over 90 countries. The website reflects a professional digital presence using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, supported by a Shopware 6 CMS backend. However, the site suffers from critical security shortcomings, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which severely impact the security posture and user trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and a consent management platform. The company maintains transparency through corporate policies and whistleblower mechanisms, and engages users via social media and career portals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching isi.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The iSi Group operates in the energy and transportation sectors, providing specialized pressurized gas charging solutions. Its diversified business model includes automotive, components, and culinary divisions, targeting industrial and consumer markets globally. The company leverages partnerships for HR and compliance services, indicating a mature operational ecosystem. The website content and structure support a strong brand image and market positioning, with clear navigation and relevant business information. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms and social media.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers are implemented, critical HTTPS enforcement is missing, and advanced features like OCSP stapling and session resumption are absent. No known vulnerabilities or malware were detected, but the SSL misconfiguration is a critical issue that must be addressed immediately to protect user data and maintain compliance with security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and TLS 1.2+ protocols.
  2. Enable and enforce HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to prevent downgrade attacks.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Regularly audit and update security headers and Content Security Policy for enhanced protection.
  5. Enhance transparency by publishing incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Apache server, Next.js framework, React library, and Shopware 6 CMS. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. Despite modern frontend technologies, the site performance metrics indicate zero load time and resource count, suggesting incomplete or placeholder data. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are good, with responsive design and proper meta tags. However, the lack of valid SSL and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and risk. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with isi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review isi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.