Skip to main content

Security report for iridex.com

Iridex Corporation · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Iridex Corporation is a well-established manufacturer specializing in ophthalmic laser medical devices, serving ophthalmologists and eye care professionals globally. With over 35 years of innovation, the company offers a broad portfolio including retinal lasers, glaucoma devices, and surgical instruments, supported by physician education and clinical resources. The website reflects a mature business with a clear market position in healthcare technology. Technically, the site is built on DotNetNuke CMS with ASP.NET WebForms, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot. While the site is functional and professionally designed, there are areas for improvement in mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and does not publish explicit security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy and business credible but could enhance security and privacy practices to align with best standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iridex.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Iridex operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on ophthalmic laser technologies. The company targets medical professionals specializing in retina and glaucoma treatments. Its business model centers on manufacturing and selling advanced laser devices and consumables, supplemented by educational content and clinical support. The presence of investor relations and multiple international domains indicates a medium-sized enterprise with global reach. The company leverages partnerships and localized sites to expand market penetration. The website content and structure support a professional brand image with consistent messaging and trust signals such as testimonials and certifications. Growth indicators include recent product launches and active news updates.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited protects against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. Tracking technologies are used responsibly but without explicit cookie consent, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Enhancing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies would improve the overall posture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Iridex Corporation
Description
Leading ophthalmic laser manufacturer offering advanced ophthalmic medical devices designed for precise eye treatments and superior patient outcomes.
Key services
Ophthalmic lasers, Retinal surgical instruments, Glaucoma devices, Veterinary ophthalmic devices, Physician education and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
DotNetNuke CMS, jQuery, Telerik UI, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot, iframe-resizer
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Platforms
Windows Server hosting (implied by ASP.NET)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses DotNetNuke CMS with ASP.NET WebForms technology.
  2. Content is focused on ophthalmic laser medical devices and related education.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. Social media presence is strong with official accounts on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Instagram.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published on the site.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is well maintained and registered with a reputable registrar.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot are present.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET WebForms platform using DotNetNuke CMS, supported by jQuery and Telerik UI components. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot. The site performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The use of legacy technologies like WebForms may indicate technical debt but also stability. No critical technical vulnerabilities were found, though modernization opportunities exist to improve performance and security. Hosting details are not explicit but likely Windows-based given the technology stack. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iridex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iridex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.