Skip to main content

Security report for ir.ee

Register OÜ · Finance · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Register OÜ operates the Inforegister website, a platform providing credit ratings, beneficial ownership information, financial forecasts, and business risk assessments primarily targeting Estonian businesses and individuals. The company positions itself as a trusted local provider of business and financial data services, leveraging a subscription-based model to deliver valuable insights. The website supports multiple languages and offers a user-friendly search interface to access company and individual data. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Site Kit for analytics and OAuth for authentication, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communications. Security posture is solid with cookie consent mechanisms and no visible vulnerabilities, although there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence with good compliance to privacy regulations and a clear business focus.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ir.ee

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inforegister serves a niche market in Estonia focused on business credit and financial data analytics. Its competitive advantage lies in providing comprehensive and up-to-date business risk and credit information, which is critical for financial institutions, businesses, and individuals making informed decisions. The business model relies on subscription services and data access, supported by partnerships with related entities such as Kreedix group and SSB. The company maintains a consistent brand and leverages social media channels for outreach. Growth potential exists in expanding data services and enhancing digital offerings. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled communication channel, likely managed through dedicated contact pages. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused market presence in Estonia.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliant with GDPR, and use of OAuth for secure user authentication. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response information, and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates areas for enhancement. The site does not currently provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which could improve transparency and trust. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be strengthened to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Register OÜ
Registration number
11735006
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Register OÜ
Description
Inforegister hoiab ettevõtete ning nende omanike tegevustel kätt pulsil | Ettevõtlusandmed | Äririskid | Hinnangud | Prognoosid
Key services
Credit ratings, Beneficial owners information, Financial forecasts, Business risk assessments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Site Kit, OAuth SSO, Material Symbols font, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • Use of OAuth for authentication

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner present with detailed cookie descriptions
  3. No exposed sensitive data or credentials found
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Google Site Kit plugin
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact page exists externally
  8. No terms of service page detected
  9. Site supports multiple languages (Estonian, English, Russian)
  10. OAuth SSO used for user authentication
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern front-end technologies including Material Symbols fonts and JavaScript modules for search and modal components. Google Site Kit is used for analytics integration, and OAuth SSO facilitates secure user login. The site is optimized for mobile devices and employs preloading of fonts for performance. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and canonical links. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and preloading strategies. No major technical debt or obsolete technologies were identified. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the SSL configuration is excellent, indicating a reliable hosting environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ir.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ir.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.