Skip to main content

Security report for iqvia.com

IQVIA · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IQVIA is a global leader in healthcare and life sciences, providing advanced data science, technology, and clinical research solutions to accelerate healthcare innovation and improve patient outcomes. The company offers a broad portfolio of services including research and development, real world evidence, commercialization, safety and regulatory compliance, and technology platforms. Their market position is strong, serving pharmaceutical manufacturers, healthcare providers, payers, and government entities worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and professional branding consistent with an enterprise-level organization. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as Sitecore CMS, Coveo search, Google Tag Manager, and various JavaScript libraries to deliver a responsive and interactive user experience. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the risk profile is low with a trustworthy and professional online presence. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the legitimacy given the company's global footprint and investor relations transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, and improving accessibility compliance to further strengthen trust and compliance. This assessment supports IQVIA's position as a reputable enterprise in the healthcare technology sector with a solid digital foundation and room for incremental security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iqvia.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
75
Email security
88
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IQVIA operates in the healthcare and life sciences sector, targeting pharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers, payers, and government agencies. Their business model focuses on providing integrated data, technology, and services to accelerate clinical development, real world evidence generation, commercialization, and regulatory compliance. The company benefits from a broad global presence with regional offices and thought leadership initiatives. Revenue streams likely include software products, consulting services, clinical trial management, and data analytics. The website content and structure indicate a mature organization with strong market positioning and a comprehensive portfolio addressing multiple healthcare segments and therapeutic areas. Partnerships and subsidiary domains such as investor relations sites reinforce corporate transparency and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with privacy regulations. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options which are recommended best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, and no incident response contact information is found. The absence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries is positive. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with opportunities to formalize security policies and enhance technical controls to align with enterprise security frameworks and compliance requirements such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for improved inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IQVIA
Description
Solutions to help life sciences organizations drive healthcare forward and get the right treatments to patients, faster.
Key services
Research & Development, Real World Evidence, Commercialization, Safety & Regulatory Compliance, Technologies
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery Mousewheel, Lottie Player, Ceros SDK, Google Tag Manager, Coveo Search, Font Awesome 6 Free, VideoJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Boomtrain
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Boomtrain, CookiePro
Marketing tools
Coveo Search
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is uncommon for a major company domain
  4. Strong branding and consistent professional design
  5. Comprehensive product and solution offerings in healthcare and life sciences
  6. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  8. Use of modern web technologies and third-party analytics/tracking tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Sitecore CMS platform integrated with Coveo search technology, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery Mousewheel and Lottie Player for enhanced interactivity. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tag management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing third-party scripts and assets. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable and maintainable digital presence suitable for an enterprise healthcare technology provider. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security configurations to reduce technical debt and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100Low22 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium12 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iqvia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iqvia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.