Skip to main content

Security report for ipsa-maslinovaulja.com

Energy · Croatia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website appears to be a Croatian language site focused on olive oil products, likely representing a small business in the energy/agriculture sector. The domain is well established since 2009, indicating a stable presence. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with common plugins and libraries, showing a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security best practices such as security headers and DNSSEC. No advanced analytics or tracking mechanisms were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. The security posture is basic with room for improvement in SSL enforcement and header implementation. Overall, the site is functional but lacks comprehensive compliance and security features, which could impact user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipsa-maslinovaulja.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets consumers interested in olive oil products, likely within Croatia or the surrounding region. The business model appears to be e-commerce or informational sales. The market position is unclear due to limited content and lack of branding details. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The site content is basic and lacks detailed business information or certifications. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the content. The absence of contact details and policies limits transparency and customer engagement potential.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The domain uses clientTransferProhibited status but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No evidence of HTTPS enforcement or advanced security frameworks was found. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices and compliance documentation to improve trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Enable DNSSEC and enforce HTTPS site-wide to improve security posture.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be related to olive oil products (maslinovo ulje in Croatian). The content is in Croatian language. The business likely operates in the olive oil production or sales sector targeting Croatian or regional customers interested in olive oil products.
Key services
Olive oil sales, Product information
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Ant Design (CSS/JS), Chosen jQuery plugin, Select2 plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is primarily in Croatian language focused on olive oil products.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Technical stack is WordPress-based with common plugins.
  6. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  8. No social media links or external business contact points found.
  9. WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain with no privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with common JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Ant Design components, and select box enhancers like Chosen and Select2. The site uses CDN services for DNS and static content delivery. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with no advanced metadata or structured data detected. The site lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for improved resilience. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipsa-maslinovaulja.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipsa-maslinovaulja.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.