Skip to main content

Security report for ippez.pl

Fundacja Instytut Praw Pacjenta i Edukacji Zdrowotnej · Healthcare · Poland

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Fundacja Instytut Praw Pacjenta i Edukacji Zdrowotnej is a Polish non-profit organization dedicated to enhancing patient rights awareness, promoting health education, and supporting patient organizations across Poland. The website reflects a mature presence with comprehensive content about their campaigns, projects, and educational initiatives. Their market position is that of a reputable healthcare advocacy entity with strong ties to patient communities and healthcare stakeholders. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks like Bootstrap and Divi Builder, with SEO and accessibility considerations in place. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and consent management implemented, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ippez.pl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ippez.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ippez.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on patient advocacy and education. Their business model revolves around public health campaigns, educational projects, and collaboration with other healthcare and legal entities. The presence of multiple partner organizations and government-related domains indicates a strong partnership ecosystem. The website content and structure suggest a medium-sized organization with a stable foundation since 2016. Their target audience includes patients, patient organizations, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. The organization leverages digital tools for outreach and engagement, including social media and online educational platforms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and a consent management platform for GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data shows consistent registration details without privacy protection, enhancing trust. Incident response and security policies are not publicly documented, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fundacja Instytut Praw Pacjenta i Edukacji Zdrowotnej
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fundacja Instytut Praw Pacjenta i Edukacji Zdrowotnej
Description
Wspieramy rozwiązania systemowe ukierunkowane na poprawę sytuacji pacjentów oraz oddziaływanie na kształtowanie prozdrowotnych postaw Polaków.
Key services
Patient rights education, Health education campaigns, Organizing conferences and forums, Supporting patient organizations, Providing a database of patient organizations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Quantcast Consent Manager, Divi Builder
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management platform for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Quantcast
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Quantcast Consent Manager
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO Premium, Facebook Pixel, Quantcast Consent Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit focused on patient rights and health education in Poland.
  2. Content is rich with campaigns, projects, and organizational information.
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  4. Active social media presence with official accounts linked.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional headers and policies.
  7. Consent management is implemented for GDPR compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Divi Builder and Bootstrap framework, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It uses common JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Select2, and includes carousel functionality via Owl Carousel. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO Premium plugin, and analytics/tracking are managed through Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Quantcast Consent Manager. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features, though these could be further enhanced. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and media content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the data. Overall, the technical implementation supports the organization's digital goals effectively with room for optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ippez.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ippez.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.