Skip to main content

Security report for ipa.co.uk

Institute of Practitioners in Advertising · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Institute of Practitioners in Advertising (IPA) is a well-established UK-based professional membership organization incorporated by Royal Charter. It serves advertising practitioners and agencies by providing continuous professional development, legal advice, industry research, and advocacy. The website reflects a mature and authoritative presence in the advertising sector, targeting industry professionals and member agencies. The business model centers on membership services and industry support, positioning IPA as a key influencer in UK advertising. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, consent management platforms, and analytics tools, ensuring a good digital maturity level. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and consent management, though some security headers and explicit security policies are not publicly visible. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting IPA's reputation as a credible industry body.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipa.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IPA holds a strong market position as a Royal Charter-incorporated body supporting UK advertising professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive member services including legal support, CPD programs, and industry research. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and event participation. The target customers are advertising agencies and practitioners seeking professional development and industry resources. The website indicates active engagement with members through legal advice, insight centers, and events. Partnerships with platforms like LinkedIn and Google for analytics and marketing tools suggest a mature digital ecosystem. The organization's long domain age and consistent branding reinforce its stability and trustworthiness in the market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of a consent management platform (Usercentrics), and integration of trusted analytics services. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a public security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. There is no visible security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy. The site would benefit from publishing these to enhance security culture and incident readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional transparency and header implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities or outdated components are present.
  5. Enhance data retention and privacy disclosures related to analytics and tracking to align with best GDPR practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Institute of Practitioners in Advertising
Description
The Institute of Practitioners in Advertising, incorporated by Royal Charter, supports UK advertising practitioners through professional development, legal advice, research, and industry resources. It also runs initiatives like EffWorks to promote accountable marketing.
Key services
Continuous Professional Development (CPD) Programmes, Legal advice for members, Industry research and publications, Events and awards, Talent and diversity initiatives
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP, LinkedIn Insight Tag, AddThis, PostcodeAnywhere
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager
  • Consent management platform (Usercentrics) implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, AddThis
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear navigation with comprehensive menus covering all key areas.
  3. Strong focus on membership services, legal advice, and industry resources.
  4. Use of modern tracking and consent management tools.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and physical address.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with libraries such as jQuery and various tracking scripts including Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight. It employs a consent management platform (Usercentrics) to handle cookie consent, indicating GDPR awareness. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and accessible navigation. Hosting and domain registration are stable and long-term, with 123-Reg as the registrar. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing scripts and assets. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for security header enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipa.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipa.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.