Skip to main content

Security report for invl.com

INVL Asset Management · Finance · Lithuania

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INVL Asset Management operates as a leading alternative asset manager in the Baltic states, focusing on private equity, real estate, private debt, and fund of funds. The company targets investors seeking diversified alternative investment opportunities in the Baltic region. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive information about investment funds and sustainability initiatives. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to prevent bot abuse, alongside a robust cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of explicit security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. The missing WHOIS registration data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy, though the professional web presence and privacy compliance mitigate some risk. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and security posture but could enhance business credibility by providing clearer contact and legal information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching invl.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
87
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INVL Asset Management holds a strong market position as a leading alternative asset manager in the Baltic region, offering a diversified portfolio of investment funds including private equity, real estate, and private debt. The business model revolves around asset management services targeting institutional and private investors. The company leverages partnerships and a broad fund offering to maintain competitive advantages. The website content reflects a focus on transparency and sustainability, appealing to socially responsible investors. Growth indicators include a wide range of funds and capital funds, suggesting active expansion. The absence of explicit contact details on the website may limit direct client engagement but the presence of privacy and cookie policies indicates regulatory compliance. The company appears to operate at a large scale within the finance sector in Lithuania.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and the use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, providing users control over tracking and data collection, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for maturity in security governance and transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INVL Asset Management
Description
INVL Asset Management yra pirmaujanti alternatyvaus turto valdytoja Baltijos šalyse.
Key services
Private equity funds, Real estate funds, Private debt funds, Fund of funds
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Axios, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Marker.io
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot detection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian and English
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in provided content
  4. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages detected
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google services evident
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with modules and asynchronous loading, leveraging libraries such as Axios for HTTP requests and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags and canonical links. Performance appears moderate with preloading of critical CSS and scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected from the content. The technical stack supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with invl.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review invl.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.