Skip to main content

Security report for invin.cz

INVIN s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INVIN s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based company specializing in comprehensive project and construction management services, including cost management, technical supervision, safety coordination, and engineering activities. Established since 2010 and part of the AD Group, the company serves business clients requiring professional project solutions. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and a portfolio of certifications such as ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001, indicating a commitment to quality and safety standards. The company targets organizations in the real estate and construction sectors, positioning itself as a reliable service provider with a medium-sized operational scale. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing common libraries like jQuery and Owl Carousel, and enhanced with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms via the Complianz plugin. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though additional security headers could improve defenses. Privacy compliance is well implemented with clear cookie policies and opt-in consent, aligning with EU GDPR requirements. Security-wise, the site lacks explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection slightly reduces transparency but is common for business domains. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant, with room for security enhancements. Strategically, the company should focus on publishing incident response information, enhancing security headers, and possibly revealing more registrant data to improve trust. These steps will strengthen their security posture and compliance, supporting their market position and client confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching invin.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INVIN s.r.o. operates in the project and construction management sector within the Czech Republic, serving a business clientele with a comprehensive suite of services. Their affiliation with AD Group suggests integration into a larger corporate ecosystem, potentially providing stability and resource access. The company leverages certifications to differentiate itself and build trust. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on project delivery and management consulting. The website's multilingual support indicates targeting of international or diverse regional clients. Marketing and analytics tools are used moderately, balancing user privacy with business insights. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and client references, supporting growth and partnership opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a gap. There is no visible incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy, which are important for security maturity and transparency. The use of common WordPress plugins requires ongoing patching to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adopting additional headers, publishing incident response details, and implementing a security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  2. Publish incident response contact information and establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Increase transparency by providing more detailed WHOIS or company registration information if possible.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
INVIN s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INVIN s.r.o.
Description
Komplexní řešení vašich projektů - project management, cost management, technical supervision, safety coordination, construction management, engineering activities.
Key services
Project management, Cost management, Technical supervision, Safety coordination (BOZP), Construction management, Value engineering, Engineering activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Owl Carousel, WordPress, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
WPML (multilingual), Responsive Lightbox
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech with multilingual support (English, German).
  3. Strong cookie and privacy compliance with opt-in consent.
  4. No explicit security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection.
  6. Professional design and clear navigation.
  7. Use of WordPress CMS with common plugins.
  8. Presence of ISO certifications and client references enhances trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern but common technology stack including jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components. It uses the Complianz GDPR plugin for cookie consent management and WPML for multilingual support. The site loads scripts asynchronously and defers emoji scripts for performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. The technical infrastructure is standard for small to medium business websites, with no evident technical debt but opportunities for modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with invin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review invin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.