Skip to main content

Security report for invia.hu

Invia.hu · Hospitality · Hungary

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Invia.hu is a well-established online travel aggregator serving the Hungarian market, offering a wide range of travel packages, tours, and flight bookings from nearly 100 travel organizers. The website is professionally designed with good content relevance and user experience, targeting travelers seeking convenient and cost-effective travel solutions. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Sentry, and Split.io, and enforces HTTPS for secure communications. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive and GDPR-compliant, providing users granular control over their data. However, explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages were not detected in the provided content, representing an area for improvement. Security posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of a published security policy and incident response contacts limits transparency. Overall, Invia.hu demonstrates a mature digital presence with a strong market position in the hospitality sector, though enhancing compliance documentation and security disclosures would further strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching invia.hu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
92
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Invia.hu operates as a key player in the Central and Eastern European online travel market, leveraging partnerships with numerous travel organizers to provide a comprehensive booking platform. Its business model focuses on aggregating travel offers and facilitating bookings, targeting Hungarian-speaking travelers interested in vacations, tours, and flights. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and a well-structured website optimized for mobile users. Its marketing ecosystem includes retargeting and ad networks like Criteo and RTB House, enhancing customer acquisition and engagement. While the site lacks explicit contact information and detailed corporate disclosures in the analyzed content, its domain registration and related sister sites in Czechia and Slovakia support its regional credibility. The platform's extensive use of analytics and tracking indicates a data-driven approach to market growth and customer insights.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of security monitoring tools like Sentry. The cookie consent framework is robust, allowing users to manage preferences across essential, preference, statistical, and marketing cookies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were identified in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response procedures, and dedicated security contact channels reduces transparency and may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. The site would benefit from implementing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to further harden defenses. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by formalizing and publishing security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently linked on the website.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Implement and publish incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Improve website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and enhance user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Invia.hu
Description
Invia.hu aggregates offers from nearly 100 domestic and international travel organizers, providing users with the best travel deals in one place, enabling easy booking without hidden costs.
Key services
Travel package bookings, Holiday and tour offers, Flight ticket bookings, Hotel reservations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Sentry (error tracking), Split.io (feature flagging), Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot (cookie consent), Usercentrics (CMP), Hotjar (analytics), IndexedDB, LocalStorage
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Sentry
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Criteo, RTB House, Appnexus
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Split.io
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional travel aggregator targeting Hungarian market.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with granular controls.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  4. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools indicates mature digital marketing.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided HTML snippet.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly visible.
  7. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with asynchronous loading of scripts and integration of third-party services for analytics, feature flagging, and cookie consent management. Technologies detected include Sentry for error tracking, Split.io for feature management, Google Tag Manager for marketing tags, and Cookiebot/Usercentrics for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses IndexedDB and LocalStorage for client-side data persistence. Performance is moderate with optimizations like preconnect hints and async script loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive CSS stylesheets. No CMS or hosting provider was explicitly identified from the HTML content. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable and maintainable platform but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with invia.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review invia.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.