Skip to main content

Security report for investors.lv

SIA "Investors" · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Investors" is a well-established Latvian accounting and financial services company with over 20 years of experience. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including bookkeeping, payroll and tax calculations, financial analysis, management accounting, audits, and legal consulting. Their target audience includes new business starters, financial directors, company owners, and investors seeking reliable accounting support. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with clear service offerings and client testimonials, positioning them as a leading player in the Latvian market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and integrates modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for security. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, although some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities detected, but explicit security headers and privacy policies are lacking. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional business presence with moderate risk. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification, but the content and technical setup suggest a legitimate and stable operation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security policy transparency would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of investors.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching investors.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector, focusing on outsourced accounting and financial management services. Their business model relies on long-term client relationships and delivering value through expertise and comprehensive service coverage. The presence of client testimonials and use of advanced document management systems indicate a mature service offering. The company targets a diverse client base from startups to established enterprises and investors, suggesting a broad market reach. The website's multilingual support (Latvian, Russian, English) further supports their inclusive market approach. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent medium-sized enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which is common for small to medium businesses but could be improved. The absence of a published privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, indicating good maintenance practices. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and policy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Ensure all forms have CSRF protection and validate inputs server-side to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Investors"
Description
Viena no Latvijas vadošajām grāmatvedības kompānijām. Piesakieties 14 dienu izmēģinājumam tūlīt un saņem pirmo apkalpošanas mēnesi ar 50% atlaidi.
Key services
Grāmatvedības uzskaite, Algu un nodokļu aprēķins, Finanšu analīze, Vadības grāmatvedība, Grāmatvedības ekspertīze, Ekspress-audits, Lietvedības un juridiskie jautājumi, Pirmsiegādes izpēte, Finanšu direktora ārpakalpojums
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.1, Elementor 3.27.2, PHP, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, Rank Math SEO plugin, jQuery, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. Contact information including phone and email is clearly presented.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn is linked.
  8. Business is a medium-sized accounting and financial services provider in Latvia.
  9. No security incidents or vulnerability disclosures are publicly visible.
  10. Use of professional SEO and analytics tools is evident.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging popular libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA are integrated for analytics and security respectively. The site uses optimized CSS and JavaScript loading strategies, including autoptimize caching. Mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization are well implemented, with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for local business and article schema. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and loading speed. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with investors.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review investors.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.